Sep 112012
 

“9-11″ REMEMBRANCE:

Watch the 11th Anniversary Ceremony Live Webcast

 

 

World Trade Center: Majestic Beauty & Pride!

 

 

 

World Trade Center Under Attack!

 

World Trace Center… Now Only In Our Memories!

 

The 9/11 Memorial will provide a live webcast of the New York City ceremony marking the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. Join us in remembering and paying tribute at 911memorial.org.

The live webcast will begin at 8:30 a.m., Tuesday, September 11, 2012.

 

 

Main Page: http://www.911memorial.org/

Webcast Page: http://www.911memorial.org/watch-11th-anniversary-ceremony-live-webcast

 

ALWAYS REMEMBER… & NEVER FORGET!

 

 

Jan 012012
 

After Struggle on Detainees, Obama Signs Defense Bill

The New York Times
By
 December 31, 2011

 

 

HONOLULU —

 

President Obama, after objecting to provisions of a military spending bill that would have forced him to try terrorism suspects in military courts and impose strict sanctions on Iran’s oil exports, signed the bill on Saturday.

He said that although he did not support all of it, changes made by Congress after negotiations with the White House had satisfied most of his concerns and had given him enough latitude to manage counterterrorism and foreign policy in keeping with administration principles.

“The fact that I support this bill as a whole does not mean I agree with everything in it,” Mr. Obama said in a statement issued in Hawaii, where he is on vacation. “I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation and prosecution of suspected terrorists.”

The bill authorizes $662 billion in military spending through 2012. It is a smaller amount than the Pentagon had asked for, but it does not impose the radical cuts that the military faces in coming years.

The White House had said that the legislation could lead to an improper military role in overseeing detention and court proceedings and could infringe on the president’s authority in dealing with terrorism suspects. But it said that Mr. Obama could interpret the statute in a way that would preserve his authority.

The president, for example, said that he would never authorize the indefinite military detention of American citizens, because “doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a nation.” He also said he would reject a “rigid across-the-board requirement” that suspects be tried in military courts rather than civilian courts.

Congress dropped a provision in the House version of the bill that would have banned using civilian courts to prosecute those suspected of having ties to Al Qaeda. It also dropped a new authorization to use military force against Al Qaeda and its allies.

Civil liberties groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, still oppose the law, in part because of its authorization of military detention camps overseas. But Mr. Obama’s signature is likely to settle, at least for now, the battle between the White House and Congress over executive authority in the treatment of detainees.

The White House also wrestled with Congress over requirements that the United States punish foreign financial firms that purchase Iranian oil, including through Iran’s central bank. Such a step would greatly increase the pressure on Iran over its nuclear program.

But the administration feared that if the measures were imposed too hastily, they could disrupt the oil market, driving up prices and alienating countries, including close allies, that the United States is seeking to enlist in its pressure campaign against Iran.

Under the terms of the bill, Mr. Obama can delay sanctions by six months to assess their impact on oil prices. The president can also apply to Congress for a waiver exempting a country’s financial firms from sanctions, if he determines that the country significantly reduced its purchases of Iranian oil in the preceding 180 days. Or he can apply for a waiver exempting a country on national security grounds.

Senate Republicans, who pushed for the tougher sanctions, said it would be difficult for Mr. Obama to invoke a waiver, since it could make him look weak on Iran in an election year. But the administration said it was committed to imposing the sanctions.

“We have to do it in a timely way and phased way to avoid repercussions to the oil market, and make sure the revenues to Iran are reduced,” said an administration official who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “But we believe we can do that.”

 

Direct Link:  http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/01/us/politics/obama-signs-military-spending-bill.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha24

Dec 062011
 

U.S. ‘concerned’ over drone lost near Iran border

BBC NEWS

5 December 2011

 

This undated handout image courtesy of Truthdowser, shows a rendition of a Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel drone
Media reports identified the aircraft as an RQ-170 Sentinel drone

US officials have expressed concern at the loss of a drone near Iran’s eastern border with Afghanistan.

A Pentagon spokesman said the US was worried especially as the unmanned aircraft was “in a place where we’re not able to get to it”.

Iranian media say the drone was shot down and was now in the hands of the armed forces. It said the plane had suffered minimal damage.

The drone, known as a Sentinel, is the first such loss by the US.

US Navy Capt John Kirby said the US was concerned about any opportunity for Tehran to acquire information about the technology.

“I think we’re always concerned when there’s an aircraft, whether it’s manned or unmanned, that we lose, particularly in a place where we’re not able to get to it,” the Pentagon spokesman said.

NBC News reported that the drone was on a CIA mission at the time, but it was unclear if it was flying in Afghanistan or Iran.

Some analysts argue that Iranian military forces will not be able to replicate the technology – if they have found useable parts at all.

“This is a high-flying unmanned aircraft that malfunctioned and then fell to earth. It’s likely to be broken up into hundreds of pieces,” defence analyst Loren Thompson told the Associated Press news agency.

‘Sensitive mission’

In a statement at the weekend, the Nato-led Isaf force said: “The UAV [unmanned aerial vehicle] to which the Iranians are referring may be a US unarmed reconnaissance aircraft that had been flying a mission over western Afghanistan late last week. The operators of the UAV lost control of the aircraft and had been working to determine its status.”

map

The RQ170 Sentinel is a stealthy and highly capable unmanned aircraft. It is shaped like a large flying wing similar to the profile of the manned B2 stealth bomber.

Its shape and materials give it a low radar signature and it is clearly used for some of the most highly sensitive missions, says BBC defence and diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus.

First spotted at Kandahar air base in Afghanistan in 2007, an RQ170 Sentinel was used by the Americans to provide real-time intelligence over Osama Bin Laden’s compound in Abbotabad, Pakistan, both before and during the raid by US special forces earlier this year.

Iran said in July it had shot down a drone over the holy city of Qom, near its Fordu nuclear site.

Last January, it said it downed two “Western spy drones” in the Gulf, but produced no evidence to support the report.

 

Direct Link:  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16043626

Nov 202011
 

Congress Fears Chinese Telecom Gear May Phone Home
WIRED
By Adam Rawnsley
November 17, 2011

Photo: Wikimedia

Are telecommuniations deals with China good business — or a trojan horse for espionage? Some of Congress’ top intelligence officials are worried it’s the latter. And they’re launching an investigation to find out.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), and the committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, announced on Thursday that their committee will look into the potential for Chinese telecommunications equipment — like commercial servers, routers and switches — to help China spy on the United States.

“The investigation is to determine the extent to which these companies provide the Chinese government an opportunity for greater foreign espionage, threaten our critical infrastructure, and further the opportunity for Chinese economic espionage,” Rogers tells Danger Room. “Through this investigation we will come to a better understanding of the threat so we are better prepared to mitigate.”

The concern is that Chinese companies could tamper with equipment for use in civilian communications infrastructure, allowing China to insert Trojan horses that eavesdrop on targets in the United States. Chinese companies already make a number of telecommunications products sold in the U.S., but several have bowed out of deals to acquire large stakes in American telecom companies after facing U.S. government pressure.

Rogers says the investigation is an outgrowth of a review he commissioned shortly after becoming chairman of the committee in January.

“The findings in that preliminary review indicate that a full investigation was warranted,” he explains. “I have serious national-security concerns about Huawei, ZTE and other infrastructure companies, and will use all of the committee’s resources to determine the extent of the threat and what the government is doing about it.”

Both Huawei and ZTE have been involved in a bids to gain a great foothold in the U.S. market — only to be turned down over espionage fears.

In the past few years, Huawei was rebuffed in its attempts to purchase network infrastructure manufacturer 3Com and backed out of a deal for server company 3Leaf, after Congress and the executive branch’s Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States raised red flags. Pentagon officials claim the company has close connections to China’s People’s Liberation Army. And in November of last year, Sprint dropped ZTE from a major U.S. telecommunications infrastructure contract, under pressure from the administration and Congress.

In a joint statement released with Ruppersberger, Rogers says the investigation won’t just focus on Chinese espionage capabilities, but also on whether America’s own spooks can find and thwart any spy gear.

The House committee inquiry comes on the heels of a similar initiative from the Obama administration, first reported by the Wall Street Journal’s Siobhan Gorman, to examine the espionage risk of Chinese telecommunications companies building American telcom infrasturcture.  There, too, the administration’s concerns reportedly center on Huawei.

But telecommunications companies aren’t the only source of China-related supply chain headaches the U.S. government has these days.

Iarpa, the intelligence community’s advanced research shop, recently dropped $49 million on a program designed to keep China and other potential adversaries from tampering with microprocessors intended for use in American weapons systems or computers accessing classified information. Iarpa’s Trusted Integrated Chip project focuses on finding ways to securely build chips abroad at foreign foundries that are often cheaper than their counterparts in the United States. Darpa, Iarpa’s cousin at the Pentagon, has a similar program designed to spot already-hacked chips.

Separately, the Senate Armed Services Committee has been looking into counterfeit electronics parts, often sourced from China, making their way into U.S. military equipment.

Rogers says the spy agencies he’s spoken with “clearly appreciate the importance of the issue,” but he’s hoping the Intelligence Committee’s investigation “will contribute to a greater understanding of that threat and help encourage a more rapid response to this emerging national security concern. We cannot wait any longer.”

Direct Link: http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/11/china-trojan-horse-congress/