Anonymous hacks into tech and telecom sites

Two trade association sites that boast members such as Apple, Microsoft, IBM, AT&T, and Verizon come under attack by hackers for supporting cybersecurity legislation.

 

CNET News

by Dara Kerr

 

 

 

Anonymous is certainly making the rounds this week.

First China, now the telecom and tech industry.

The hacker group has claimed responsibility for leading denial-of-service attacks on two technology trade association Web sites, USTelecom and TechAmerica, according to Bloomberg. Anonymous is reportedly lashing out because these organizations support a cybersecurity bill that some members of congress are working to pass.

The attacks began yesterday when users were unable to log onto the sites, reports Bloomberg. USTelecom represents telecom companies, including AT&T, Verizon, and CenturyLink; and TechAmerica’s members include tech companies such as IBM, Microsoft, and Apple.

Both sites say that technicians are working to restore service for their users. Despite the high-profile companies that the sites represent, both organizations told Bloomberg they don’t host any sensitive information.

 The legislation that Anonymous is opposed to is a bipartisan bill referred to as the Rogers-Ruppersberger Cyber Security Bill. The bill is being put forth to “help the private sector defend itself from advanced cyber threats,” according to Rep. Mike Rogers’ Web site.

Both organizations seem undeterred by the attacks. USTelecom President Walter McCormick told Bloomberg that the hacks stifled free speech and Internet norms, while TechAmerica President Shawn Osborne said his organization will continue to support the legislation.

“These types of strong-arm tactics have no place in the critical discussions our country needs to be having about our cybersecurity, they just underscore the importance of them,” Osborne told Bloomberg.

 

Related stories

 

Dara Kerr, a freelance journalist based in the Bay Area, is fascinated by robots, supercomputers and Internet memes. When not writing about technology and modernity, she likes to travel to far-off countries. She is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Originally posted at Digital Media

 

Direct Link:  http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57411619-83/anonymous-hacks-into-tech-and-telecom-sites/

 

 

Flashback the largest Mac malware threat yet, experts say

 

Congratulations, Apple.

The Mac is now popular enough to attract major attention from the bad guys.

CNET News
by Josh Lowensohn and Seth Rosenblatt

 

 

 

(Credit: Intego)

Unless you’ve been living under a rock for the past week, you’ve probably heard about Flashback, a piece of malware targeting users of Apple’s Mac OS X that’s now estimated to be quietly running on more than 600,000 machines around the world.

That number, which came from Russian antivirus company Dr. Web earlier this week, was confirmed today by security firm Kaspersky. More than 98 percent of the affected computers were running Mac OS X, the firm said.

That’s certainly a big number, but how does it stack up to past threats?

“It’s the biggest, by far,” Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer at antivirus and computer security firm F-Secure, told CNET in an e-mail. “I’m afraid the malware-free times of Mac users are behind us permanently.”

Separately, Catalin Cosoi, chief security researcher for antivirus-software maker Bitdefender, said the infection was likely the largest for the Mac so far this decade, but that there’s no precise way to measure how many Mac OS computers have been compromised.

“600,000 represents around 12 percent of the Mac OS computers sold in Q4 2011,” Cosoi said, “which means that if we count the number of Mac OS devices sold in the past three years, we can estimate that less than 1 percent of the Mac OS computers are possibly infected. On the other hand, if we look at the actual numbers and not at the percentages, the numbers look pretty scary.”

 

Why now?
The consensus among security researchers is that a threat this size has been long overdue for the Mac, in no small part because of the platform’s growing popularity.

Apple has outpaced the growth of the PC industry for 23 straight quarters, according to data from IDC. While the company’s iOS devices, like the iPhone and iPad, have not surprisingly seen much faster growth and overall sales in recent years, Apple also broke a Mac sales record in its last quarter, selling more than 5 million computers — all of which were, of course, running the company’s proprietary operating system.

That kind of growth, which as of February put Apple’s installed base of Mac OS X users at 63 million, has not gone unnoticed by attackers, according to security researchers.

 

 

“As more people buy and use Macs, we’ll see more malware,” Charlie Miller, a principal research consultant for Accuvant Labs, told CNET by telephone. “Part of it too is that it’s a Java vulnerability, and the actual exploit is OS independent, so (malware writers) didn’t have to know how to write an OS X exploit.”

In this particular instance, the weak point that malware writers were targeting was Java, a technology Apple hasn’t included out of the box on its computers since 2010, but that it supports with its own releases. The runtime is used from anything from enterprise applications to popular 3D games like Minecraft. In November 2010, when announcing plans for the OpenJDK project, Apple said it would continue to maintain these versions through Lion, but that Java SE 7 and beyond would be handled and distributed by Oracle.

Java or no, Paul Ferguson, a senior threat researcher at Trend Micro, suggested that HTML5 — a Web standard in progress that Apple, Microsoft, and other browser makers are helping to build — holds the same type of threat for future attacks.

“Wait until HTML5 becomes more ubiquitous for similar types of threat vulnerabilities, and you can have a botnet that runs in your browser,” Ferguson cautioned. “The more ubiquitous these platforms are, it won’t matter if it’s a mobile device or a computer. It it’s running Java or any other cross-platform technology, the threat is there.”

 

Not the first mainstream threat to the Mac!
Malware programs are designed to harvest user information that can be sold to third parties, or used for fraudulent activities. Infected machines can also be used as botnets, which can be rented for use in distributed denial of service attacks. Flashback is the latest in a series of attacks against Mac users through malware — though it turns out not to be so new.

“Flashback’s come back around a few times now,” said Steve Bono, principal security analyst for Independent Security Evaluators. “It’s possible that these computers have been infected since the beginning — sometime last fall. These things go unpatched, and once a vulnerability is known, it can take months to make the patch.”

That’s exactly what happened with Flashback. While earlier versions that relied on a piece of software meant to look like Adobe’s Flash installer were squashed as part of security updates, this latest variant went through Java instead. Oracle updated Java to patch the vulnerability the attackers were going through in February, though Apple took longer to patch the version it maintains and delivers to users through its software update tool.

 

 

MacDefender, last year's big malware scare, pretended to be an antivirus program. MacDefender, last year’s big malware scare, pretended to be an antivirus program.

(Credit: Intego)

Prior to Flashback, the malware of interest was a piece of software called MacDefender, which also went by the name of Mac Security and Mac Protector. The fake antivirus program preyed on users by pretending to be a legitimate antivirus program that would find things on a computer then get rid of them in return for users acquiring a full license to the software. As it turned out, the viruses it was pretending to find were actually coming from MacDefender itself.

“The fake antivirus epidemic from last year was the real turning point,” Roel Schouwenberg, a senior researcher at Kaspersky Labs, told CNET. “With all the media attention, malware authors realized they could make money off Macs.”

Schouwenberg noted that besides the initial wave from Flashback, and the Mac Defender infections, there was an attack from malware that actually changed your Mac’s DNS settings.

Apple’s response to the MacDefender issue was to first issue a way for users to identify the malware when coming across it on the Web, then to release a series of updates to its own built-in malware scanner in OS X called XProtect, all in order to protect users from accidentally installing it. Those tools were also able to remove it from machines on which it had already been installed.

 

Patching the future!
One aspect of Apple’s internal culture that frustrates security experts is that the company’s stance on fixing vulnerabilities has been inconsistent. Experts note that while Apple’s mobile iOS platform has been patched in a timely manner, and there are even some at the company who “beat the security drum” (according to Schoewenberg), Flashback is an example of the process not working.

“Flashback was patched by Adobe for all major platforms back in February, but Apple only patched it this week,” Schoewenberg said. “Waiting two months is not acceptable, and we see OS X threats evolving.”

 

Apple's Gatekeeper technology coming in the next version of OS X promises to tighten down OS security.Apple’s Gatekeeper technology coming in the next version of OS X promises to tighten down OS security.

(Credit: Apple)

Apple, which declined to comment on the Flashback malware, announced plans to tighten up security in the next major version of Mac OS X, due for release this summer, with a feature called Gatekeeper. The new protection tool offers to keep users safe by requiring that developers register with Apple to have their applications signed and verified by Apple. Users can then choose whether they want to keep their computers from installing software that hasn’t been signed by a registered developer.

“The approach they’re taking is two-pronged: Gatekeeper to make you download stuff that has at least some checking for malicious code, and antivirus [XProtect] baked into the OS for when you happen to get hit,” Miller said. “On the grand scheme, they have the right ideas, they just haven’t been keeping up on things like they should.”

 

Direct Link:   http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57410702-83/flashback-the-largest-mac-malware-threat-yet-experts-say/

 

Microsoft Patches Critical Windows Zero-day Bug That Hackers Are Now Exploiting

 

Computerworld

By Gregg Keizer

April 10, 2012

 

 

Microsoft Patches Critical Windows Zero-day Bug That Hackers Are Now Exploiting

 

 

Microsoft today delivered six security updates to patch 11 vulnerabilities in Windows, Internet Explorer (IE), Office and several other products, including one bug that attackers are already exploiting.

The company also issued the first patch for Windows 8 Consumer Preview, the beta-like build Microsoft released at the end of February.

But it was MS12-027 that got the most attention today.

“Things got a bit more interesting today,” said Andrew Storms, director of security operations at nCircle Security, “because Microsoft is reporting limited attacks in the wild.”

Flaws that attackers exploit before a patch is available are called “zero-day” vulnerabilities.

The single vulnerability patched in MS12-027 is in an ActiveX control included with every 32-bit version of Office 2003, 2007 and 2010; Microsoft also called out SQL Server, Commerce Server, BizTalk Server, Visual FoxPro and Visual Basic as needing the patch.

Storms, other security experts and Microsoft, too, all identified MS12-027 as the first update users should install.

Hackers are already using the vulnerability in malformed text documents, which when opened either in Word or WordPad — the latter is a bare bones text editor bundled with every version of Windows, including Windows 7 — can hijack a PC, Microsoft acknowledged in a post to its Security Research & Defense (SRD) blog today.

“We list MS12-027 as our highest priority security update to deploy this month because we are aware of very limited, targeted attacks taking advantage of [the] CVE-2012-0158 vulnerability using specially-crafted Office documents,” said Elia Florio, an engineer with the Microsoft Security Response Center, in the SRD blog post.

Microsoft did not disclose when it first became aware of the attacks, or who reported the vulnerability to its security team.

Storms speculated that an individual or company had been attacked, uncovered the bug and notified Microsoft.

Microsoft rarely deploys a patch “out of cycle,” meaning outside its usual second Tuesday of every month schedule. The last such update was shipped in December 2011, and was the first for that year.

Also affected is software written by third-party developers who have bundled the buggy ActiveX control with their code or called it. Those developers will have to provide their own updates to customers.

“Any developer that has released an ActiveX control should review the information for this security bulletin,” said Jason Miller, manager of research and development at VMware. “These developers may need to release updates to their own software to ensure they are not using a vulnerable file in their ActiveX control.”

Attackers can also exploit this bug using “drive-by download” attacks that automatically trigger the vulnerability when IE users browse to a malicious site, Microsoft admitted.

That means the flaw patched by MS12-027 is a double threat. “There are two attack scenarios. There’s the malicious website [scenario] and then RTF documents, which are pretty common,” Miller said.

Miller expects to see attackers glom onto the vulnerability once they have a chance to analyze the bug and craft their own exploits. “More and more will jump on this this month,” Miller argued.

Wolfgang Kandek, chief technology officer at Qualys, agreed. “Now that [the advisory] is published, other malware authors will be looking at it to see what’s there,” Kandek said. “We’re sure to see more attacks against this vulnerability.”

Eight of the 11 bugs patched today — including the one in MS12-027 — were rated “critical” by Microsoft, its highest threat ranking. Another was pegged “important,” and the remaining two were tagged as “moderate.”

Microsoft identified MS12-023, a five-patch fix for IE, as the other update to roll out ASAP.

The company typically releases an IE security update in even-numbered months; on those months, security professionals usually recommend that users apply the browser update first.

Not this month.

“MS12-027 trumps the IE update this month,” said Miller.

Storms also remarked on the downgrading of the IE bulletin. “When has there been a month when IE hasn’t been the one to patch first?” Storms asked. “I can’t remember one.”

 

Patches for IE9

Two of the five vulnerabilities in MS12-023 were rated critical for IE9, the newest edition of Microsoft’s browser that runs on Windows Vista and Windows 7.

Other bulletins today applied to Windows, .NET, Microsoft’s VPN (virtual private networking) tool and Office 2007 and the ancient — and no longer sold — Microsoft Works.

Miller pointed out that MS12-024, which patches a critical vulnerability in all supported versions of Windows, also applies to Windows 8 Consumer Preview.

Although the MS12-024 advisory does not mention Windows 8 Consumer Preview, anyone running that sneak peek will be offered the update, said Miller. Computerworld confirmed that MS12-024 was among several other non-security fixes Microsoft delivered to Windows 8 today.

According to Qualys, the bug in MS12-024 lets hackers hitch a ride inside legitimate software installation packages.

Amol Sarwate, manager of Qualys’ vulnerability research lab, said the vulnerability would be very attractive to purveyors of phony antivirus software, a category often called “scareware” or “rogueware.”

April’s six security updates can be downloaded and installed via the Microsoft Update and Windows Update services, as well as through Windows Server Update Services.

 

Similar Articles:

 

Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld.

 

Direct Link:  http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/253558/microsoft_patches_critical_windows_zeroday_bug_that_hackers_are_now_exploiting.html

 

Kelihos botnet still dead, say Microsoft, Kaspersky

But new botnet-building malware illustrates ‘incredibly frustrating’ job of destroying criminal infrastructure, adds Symantec

COMPUTER WORLD
By Gregg Keizer
February 6, 2012

Computerworld –

Contrary to reports, the Kelihos botnet has not crawled out of the grave, Microsoft said last week. But the company acknowledged that a new botnet is being assembled using a variant of the original malware.

The reappearance of a Kelihos-like army of hijacked computers shows just how difficult it is to eradicate a botnet, security experts said today.

“It’s not possible in most cases,” said Roel Schouwenberg, a senior researcher with Moscow-based antivirus company Kaspersky Lab, when asked whether killing a botnet was feasible. “What you’re going for is disruption more than anything.”

Liam O Murchu, manager of operations at Symantec’s security response team, agreed and said that there was only one way to insure a botnet’s death.

“If you get to the people behind it [through arrests and convictions], that will be the most successful,” said O Murchu. “But international borders and the lack of cross-country cooperation makes that a difficult road to go down.”

Kelihos was taken offline last September when Microsoft, using a federal court order, led efforts to shut down domains used by the command-and-control (C&C), severing links between the compromised computers and their order-giving master. Microsoft identified the alleged botmaster as a Russian programmer, Andrey Sabelnikov, in an amended complaint last week.

Sabelnikov, who worked for a pair of security companies from 2005 to late 2011, has proclaimed his innocence.

Talk of a Kelihos resurrection was sparked last week by Kaspersky, which said it had found signs of new malware built on the Kelihos code. The implication was that Kelihos had returned from the dead and was again spamming users.

Not so, said Richard Boscovich, a senior attorney in Microsoft’s Microsoft digital crimes unit.

“Kaspersky has reported no loss of control of the [Kelihos] peer-to-peer operations and Microsoft researchers have confirmed this week that the original Kelihos C&C and backup infrastructure remains down, but it appears [a] new botnet infrastructure may be being built with the new variant of Kelihos malware,” said Boscovich in a Jan. 3 blog.

Kaspersky confirmed that on Monday.

“The botnet we took down is still under control and infected machines are not receiving commands from the C&C centre, so they are not sending spam,” Alex Gostev, chief security expert at Kaspersky, said in a statement. “But new samples which are monitored by us continue to get orders from spammers and send spam so far. It means that we are dealing with another botnet.”

The appearance of that new botnet illustrates the difficulty researchers, software vendors and authorities have in exterminating a botnet, something that Boscovich, who cited several takedown successes, acknowledged.

“Taking down a single threat has never been Microsoft’s ultimate goal in our fight against botnets,” said Boscovich. “Rather, [we hope] to transform the fight against cybercrime by developing, testing and advancing impactful and disruptive strategies. This is a long-term effort.”

New botnets based on old-and-offline predecessors are not unusual: As Boscovich noted, the original Kelihos was probably developed using code for Waledac, a botnet that Microsoft and others brought down two years ago.

“We don’t see who is behind each botnet, what we see is an evolution,” said O Murchu. “A botnet brought down in some way may disappear for some months, but then reappear. In many cases, it’s unclear if it’s the same group or they sold their code to others [to modify].”

The struggle to eliminate a botnet has analogies in the non-digital world, said Schouwenberg. “It’s like a big drug arrest where hundreds of kilos of cocaine are seized,” he said. “It’s damaging to the criminals, but it doesn’t put them out of business.”

The ideal solution is to find, arrest and prosecute botnet makers and operators, both Schouwenberg and O Murchu said. But that’s not easy.

“It’s a frustrating task,” said O Murchu. “Researchers often know who is behind [a botnet], but to get action taken can take an incredibly long time. That’s incredibly frustrating.”

Schouwenberg and O Murchu each cited as an example the claim last month that several Russian hackers were responsible for the Koobface botnet. The five men identified by security experts as the brains behind the botnet have yet to be arrested or charged.

But the experts believed that takedowns are worthwhile, even if those efforts aren’t completely effective.

“If the fear of being caught isn’t applicable, then the best thing we can do is hit the ‘reset’ button for the bad guys, and make them start over with a new botnet,” said Schouwenberg.

 

Direct Link:  http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9223994/Kelihos_botnet_still_dead_say_Microsoft_Kaspersky

 

 

Keylogging threat could lead to more attacks, say researchers

CNET
by Seth Rosenblatt

 

A new threat is looming for browsers and it’s not related to JavaScript.

 

Security researcher Mario Heiderich reported to the maker of Firefox last year that he had found an unusual vulnerability in the browser and two other Mozilla products that run on the Gecko engine, Thunderbird, and SeaMonkey. Based in the relatively new technology that allows for animated complex vector graphics in the browser, called SVG animation, the vulnerability allowed for a malware writer to detect key strokes even when JavaScript was disabled.

Basically, he found a way to turn innocuous Web pages into keyloggers. Mozilla patched the vulnerability in Firefox 9, Thunderbird 9, and SeaMonkey 2.6. Then, as is standard operating procedure, they announced to the public what the threat was and that it had been fixed. But the real threat may lie in what the threat wasn’t: it wasn’t based in JavaScript.

“The basic premise of my research currently is scriptless attacks, meaning attack vectors working in a post-XSS world,” Heiderich said in an e-mail. He defined a “post-XSS” world as one where the cross-site scripting attack had been more or less minimized by technologies like sandboxed iFrames, Mozilla’s e-mail client Thunderbird and Firefox’s Content Security Policy, the JavaScript blocking browser add-on NoScript, and Windows 8.

“The desired goal was to do keystroke logging in the browser, doing so without necessitating JavaScript, so even if you turned off JavaScript it would work,” said Jeremiah Grossman, Chief Technical Officer at computer security research firm White Hat Security. “All the browser developers are fixing cross-site scripting. What half a dozen researchers are exploring is what you can do attack-wise in a browser without JavaScript. They’re discovering that there’s still quite a lot you can do in the browser.”

This particular SVG keylogging attack was quite nasty, said Chris Eng, vice president of research at Veracode, a computer security research firm:

“The way [it] works is that [the bad guy] binds the letter “a” to an action that causes the browser to silently issue a request for http://evil.com/?a. Pressing “b” would trigger the browser to silently issue a request for http://evil.com/?b. By “silently” I mean that there’s no visual cues to the user that anything is happening–if you were monitoring the network you would see the requests. As long as the attacker controls evil.com and can access the web server logs, he can piece together what the victim is typing, one character at a time.

Eng noted that this kind of problem always erupts whenever new standards are rolled out, especially with “extremely detailed and sometimes difficult to understand” attributes. You don’t have to go far to find evidence of this, either. Both Mozilla and Google offer hefty bounties for bug-hunters. Eng both cautioned against screaming that the sky was falling and said that this kind of attack was inherently more interesting to researchers.

A representative at Opera Inc., which has made the Opera browser since the 1990s, agreed that new specifications shouldn’t necessarily be a threat to Web browsing.

“Standard organizations and Opera are continuously adding new ways of creating web content, and as the possible code paths increase, so will the possible attack surface of any web browser. Fortunately, new specifications normally consider any security or privacy issues up front,” said Sigbjorn Vik, a core quality assurance tester at Opera, via e-mail. When asked about mobile versus desktops, he replied that as long as the technology used is the same, risks to mobile users are similar to those faced by desktop users.

As unlikely as Eng said it is for an average browser user to fall victim to these atypical and hard-to-implement attacks, Heiderich warned that it’s not anomalous. “The SVG keylogger is just one example of many, and by far not the most impact ridden one,” said Heiderich.

Another factor is that the major browser makers, including Google, Mozilla, Microsoft, Apple, and Opera, are all fairly responsive to fixing these threat vectors when discovered, said Grossman. But that doesn’t mean that there aren’t steps for the home user to take.

One way to minimize the risk from this kind of modern threat is to compartmentalize your risk, he said. “The best way [to protect yourself] is behavior, not product. Whether in Firefox, IE, or Chrome, I would use any one of the major browsers for secure browsing, such as banking or Facebook. For promiscuous browsing, such as news surfing, I use a different browser.

Eng concurred and said that there aren’t many defenses against attacks that don’t rely on JavaScript. “You usually have to just wait for the browser bugs to be fixed. So my options are more limited–either don’t use that browser at all, use a completely separate browser for trusted sites versus untrusted ones, [or] stay off the Internet.”

Originally posted at The Download Blog

 

 

Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don’t have to, including browsers and security on Windows, Mac, and Android. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2, although let’s face it: there are far scarier things out there besides long-dead operating systems. For instance, take the rumored Angry Birds/FarmVille crossover app…

Direct Link:  http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57353483-83/keylogging-threat-could-lead-to-more-attacks-say-researchers/

 

What Kind of Germ Creates a Computer Virus?
TIME Magazine / U.S.
By Jessica Reaves
Tuesday, June 20, 2000

I am tired of these viruses.

Every morning, I come into work, relatively chipper and ready to face the day. Problem is, more mornings than not, I’m met with the dispiriting news that a new high-tech bug is stalking my computer. By 10:30 or so, I’ve reached a state of low-grade panic; I have a third cup of coffee and imagine the virus circling my e-mail in-box like a vulture hunting for injured prey. And I know I’m in for it, because let’s face facts: In the grand scheme of the Internet world, I’m roughly the equivalent of a field mouse who’s had both its knees kicked in.

It’s taken me a long time to admit this, but here goes: I know close to nothing about computers, and my ignorance renders me virtually defenseless against the machinations of a bunch of 15-year-old kids with pocket protectors.

I know, I know. That’s an ugly stereotype of hackers. I’m sure that some of them are at least 18. But even that doesn’t really make me feel any better. And now, after enduring the onslaught of “Melissa,” the “Love Bug” and now “Stages,” I’ve just about had it. I want some answers. Who are these people and why are they so bent on destroying my hard drive and depriving me of precious e-mail?

Let’s take those questions one at a time. I’ll provide my deeply uninformed responses first, and then we’ll turn things over to the experts.

Who are these people?

Most hackers are obscenely young computer geniuses whose IQs probably trump mine by roughly 30 points. Most of these people are not what you would call social butterflies. They hack alone.

Dr. Charles Kreitzberg, CEO of Cognetics Corporation, a software company in Princeton Junction, N.J.:

“Most hackers are creative and intelligent, but they’re not necessarily people who fit comfortably into mainstream culture; they’re a counterculture group that likes to operate with relatively few face-to-face interactions.”

Why do they do it?

That’s a question doomed to yield little more than informed guesses. My feeling is that viruses are the 21st-century equivalent of the pig’s-blood scene in “Carrie.” In other words, we’re dealing with a bunch of people who didn’t have a great time in high school, and whose deepest desires fluctuate daily between wanting to be Bill Gates and wanting to destroy the entire Microsoft mainframe.

Haverford College professor Douglas Davis, who specializes in personality psychology and how people are affected by computer systems:

“In psychoanalytic terms, these hackers have a fantasy about what’s going to happen. They probably imagine their victims thinking they’re going to have a pleasurable experience (like opening a love letter or reading a joke) and it turns into something really rotten. It’s kind of like leaving an unpleasant package in someone’s mailbox and watching them open it. Hacking is, of course, a huge power trip for a young kid who gets to inflict this kind of inconvenience or actual discomfort on a whole lot of grown-ups, including the heads of the same corporations many of these kids might like to see humiliated.”

Dr. Kreitzberg:

“Obviously, there’s a wide spectrum of hackers, and most are not evil people trying to create havoc. If you look at most viruses, they don’t create terrible destruction. It’s much more like Zorro leaving his Z — these people want to let you know they were there, and that they were successful. Having said that, there is a lot of spurious philosophy evident in their content that’s reminiscent of the 1960s. Back then, the counterculture believed that the military industrial complex was evil, and there was a movement to eat away at it from the outside. Today, hackers look at big business as evil, and when they manage to slow or even stop those corporations, they see themselves as revolutionaries, like David felling Goliath.”

Yeah, well, I’m certainly pleased these hackers get to flex their biblical knowledge and hit one home for the little people and everything. But here’s a word of advice for any hackers who want to become just a tad more user-friendly: Next time you feel like hacking something, guys, stick to the real Goliaths and for Pete’s sake, stay the heck out of my tiny little cubicle.

Direct Link: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,47866,00.html#ixzz1gSxs0sO5

 

Criminals impersonate UK police to spread ransom Trojan
Demands payment for accessing extremist websites and porn
Techworld
By John E Dunn
12 September 2011


 

The recent spate of ransom malware has taken a strange turn with the news that criminals are impersonating the UK’s Metropolitan Police Service in an attempt to persuade victims to pay a fine for being caught accessing extremist or porn websites.

After apparently being alerted by members of the public and an unamed security company, the Met’s Police Central eCrime Unit (PCeU) has put out a warning about the scam in which unnamed malware locks up infected PCs before demanding a “substantial fee” be sent to the police organisation.

“The message advises the user that they have been caught accessing extreme pornography or terrorism related websites,” said a note put out by the PCeU. “It states that to unlock their computers they are required to forward a substantial fee to the MPS, by way of an online payment service.”

The PCeU was not able to confirm which malware was involved nor to elaborate on the infection mechanism beyond stating that infection could happen after visiting “certain websites,”a vagueness that compromises the usefulness of the warning to some extent.

Given the adoption of the MPS as the method of threat, however, the attack will be aimed at UK users who have no connection to either porn or extremism.

The attack is similar to Ransom.an, a Trojan reported only days ago which demands in German language text that claims to be from Microsoft that victims pay $126 for a Windows license within 48 hours or be locked out of their PCs.

This type of ransom social engineering attack has flared up every now and again at relatively low levels ever since first being tried in 2006, with one of the most persistent culprits being Gpcode. Usually the locking mechanism is either non-existent or can be reversed easily by security researchers; occasionally the attack has used encryption but that approach has fallen out of favour because it adds complexity.

Ransom attacks are nowadays mostly extreme variations on fake antivirus scam theme, where attackers seek to gain payment for non-existent PC infections. It is probably the success of this type of attack as much as anything else that has kept ransom malware on the fringes.

Direct Link:  http://news.techworld.com/security/3302864/criminals-impersonate-uk-police-to-spread-ransom-trojan/

 

Feds lead biggest botnet takedown ever, end massive clickjack fraud
Cripples ‘DNS Changer’ botnet of 4 million machines allegedly controlled by Estonians
By Gregg Keizer
November 10, 2011

Computerworld – The botnet takedown announced Wednesday by the U.S. Department of Justice was the biggest in history, according to a security company that worked with authorities to identify the alleged criminals.

Dubbed “DNS Changer,” the collection of compromised computers numbered over four million machines, or more than twice the size of the Rustock botnet that Microsoft and U.S. law enforcement officials brought to its knees last March.

About a quarter of the bots were Windows PCs and Macs based in the U.S.

Feike Hacquebord, a senior threat researcher at Trend Micro, called the operation the “biggest cybercriminal takedown in history” in a blog post yesterday.

Trend Micro was one of several companies and organizations credited by the FBI for contributing to the investigation leading to the takedown. Others included Mandiant, Neustar, Spamhaus and the University of Alabama at Birmingham’s computer forensics research group.

Preet Bharara, the Manhattan-based U.S. District Attorney in charge of the case, said the fraud conducted with the botnet was “massive and sophisticated.”

On Wednesday, the DOJ charged seven men — six Estonians and one Russian — with 27 counts of wire fraud, money laundering and illegal computer access, alleging that the group operated a lucrative clickjacking scheme that generated over $14 million during a four-year period.

*** [ Six of the defendants resided in Estonia during the operation, which took place from 2007 to 2011. They were Vladimir Tsastsin, Timur Gerassimenko, Dmitri Jegorow, Valeri Aleksejev, Konstantin Poltev and Anton Ivanov. The seventh defendant, Andrey Taame, resided in Russia. ] ***

The malware responsible for hijacking users’ clicks — which were then redirected to hacker-created sites that resembled the real domains — came in a variety of forms, said researchers and authorities.

According to the Internet Storm Center, some of whose security experts were part of a working group that advised the DOJ, the botnet was created with several malware families, including the pernicious TDSS rootkit — also known as “Alureon” — as well as Trojan horses crafted for Mac OS X.

The federal indictment said that the gang infected personal computers by luring users to malicious websites or by duping them into downloading and installing purported video codecs that the scams claimed were necessary to view videos.

Trend Micro, which said it had been tracking the DNS Changer botnet since 2006, added that the alleged criminals updated the malware daily to change the DNS (domain name system) settings of each bot.

The malware also blocked users from updating most installed antivirus software, or receiving operating system patch updates, the indictment alleged.

Along with the arrests in Estonia — the Russian defendant remained at large — the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) shut down over 100 domain and botnet command-and-control (C&C) servers hosted at data centers in New York City and Chicago.

That would have left infected PCs and Macs without a way to connect to the Internet: Seizing the domain servers effectively wiped their road map to the Web’s addresses. Instead, a federal judge approved a plan in which clean DNS servers were deployed by the Internet Systems Consortium (ISC), the non-profit group that maintains the popular BIND DNS open-source software.

ISC will operate the replacement DNS servers for 120 days, long enough, authorities said Wednesday, for users and Internet service providers (ISPs) to identify and scrub infected computers of the DNS Changer malware.

Unlike other botnet takedowns, such as the one aimed at Coreflood earlier this year, the DOJ will not remotely clean infected systems.

The FBI has posted instructions (download PDF) that people can use to determine whether their DNS records have been scrambled by the alleged hackers.

The agency has also created a tool that checks for DNS settings that may be among those controlled by the gang.

Microsoft, which has assisted in several botnet takedowns this year but did not participate in what authorities yesterday described as “Operation Ghost Click,” praised the botnet crippling.

“We commend the FBI and Department of Justice for the arrests, which we see as progress in the ongoing effort to hold cybercriminals accountable for their actions,” Microsoft said in a statement late Wednesday.

Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld

Direct Link: http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9221699/Feds_lead_biggest_botnet_takedown_ever_end_massive_clickjack_fraud?taxonomyId=82&pageNumber=1

 

Hackers steal SSL certificates for CIA, MI6, Mossad
Criminals acquired over 500 DigiNotar digital certificates; Mozilla and Google issue ‘death sentence’
By Gregg Keizer
September 4, 2011

Computerworld – The tally of digital certificates stolen from a Dutch company in July has exploded to more than 500, including ones for intelligence services like the CIA, the U.K.’s MI6 and Israel’s Mossad, a Mozilla developer said Sunday.

The confirmed count of fraudulently-issued SSL (secure socket layer) certificates now stands at 531, said Gervase Markham, a Mozilla developer who is part of the team that has been working to modify Firefox to blocks all sites signed with the purloined certificates.

Among the affected domains, said Markham, are those for the CIA, MI6, Mossad, Microsoft, Yahoo, Skype, Facebook, Twitter and Microsoft’s Windows Update service.

“Now that someone (presumably from Iran) has obtained a legit HTTPS cert for CIA.gov, I wonder if the US gov will pay attention to this mess,” Christopher Soghoian, a Washington D.C.-based researcher noted for his work on online privacy, said in a tweet Saturday.

Soghoian was referring to assumptions by many experts that Iranian hackers, perhaps supported by that country’s government, were behind the attack. Google has pointed fingers at Iran, saying that attacks using an ill-gotten certificate for google.com had targeted Iranian users.

All the certificates were issued by DigiNotar, a Dutch issuing firm that last week admitted its network had been hacked in July.

The company claimed that it had revoked all the fraudulent certificates, but then realized it had overlooked one that could be used to impersonate any Google service, including Gmail. DigiNotar went public only after users reported their findings to Google.

Criminals or governments could use the stolen certificates to conduct “man-in-the-middle” attacks, tricking users into thinking they were at a legitimate site when in fact their communications were being secretly intercepted.

Google and Mozilla said this weekend that they would permanently block all the digital certificates issued by DigiNotar, including those used by the Dutch government.

Their decisions come less than a week after Google, Mozilla and Microsoft all revoked more than 200 SSL (secure socket layer) certificates for use in their browsers, but left untouched hundreds more, many of which were used by the Dutch government to secure its websites.

“Based on the findings and decision of the Dutch government, as well as conversations with other browser makers, we have decided to reject all of the Certificate Authorities operated by DigiNotar,” Heather Adkins, an information security manager for Google, said in a Saturday blog post.

Johnathan Nightingale, director of Firefox engineering, echoed that late on Friday.

“All DigiNotar certificates will be untrusted by Mozilla products,” said Nightingale, who also said that the Dutch government had reversed its position of last week — when it had asked browser makers to exempt its DigiNotar certificates.

“The Dutch government has since audited DigiNotar’s performance and rescinded this assessment,” Nightingale said. “This is not a temporary suspension, it is a complete removal from our trusted root program.”

On Saturday, Piet Hein Donner, the Netherlands’s Minister of the Interior, said the government could not guarantee the security of its websites because of the DigiNotar hack, and told citizens not to log into its sites until new certificates had been obtained from other sources.

The DigiNotar breach is being audited by Fox-IT, which told the Dutch government that it was likely certificates for its sites had been fraudulently acquired by hackers.

Several security researchers said the move by browser makers puts an end to DigiNotar’s certificate business.

“Effectively a death sentence for DigiNotar,” said Jeremiah Grossman, CTO of WhiteHat Security, in a Friday tweet.

Mozilla was scathing in its criticism of DigiNotar.

Nightingale ticked off the missteps that led Mozilla to permanently block all sites signed with the company’s certificates, including DigiNotar’s failure to notify browser vendors in July and its inability to tell how many certificates had been illegally obtained. “[And] the attack is not theoretical,” Nightingale added.

“We have received multiple reports of these certificates being used in the wild.”

Markham went into greater detail on the hack and its ramifications. “It has now emerged that DigiNotar had not noticed the full extent of the compromise,” said Markham in a Saturday post to his personal blog. “The attackers had managed to hide the traces of the misissuance — perhaps by corrupting log files.”

Because the Google certificate that prompted DigiNotar to acknowledge the intrusion was obtained before most of the others, Markham speculated that there had actually been two separate attacks, perhaps by different groups.

“It is at least possible (but entirely speculative) that an initial competent attacker has had access to [DigiNotar's] systems for an unknown amount of time, and a second attacker gained access more recently and their less-subtle, bull-in-a-china shop approach in issuing the [hundreds of] certificates triggered the alarms,” he said.

Last week, Helsinki-based antivirus company F-Secure said it had found signs that DigiNotar’s network had been compromised as early as May 2009.

Mozilla will update Firefox 6 and Firefox 3.6 on Tuesday to permanently block all DigiNotar-issued certificates, including those used by the Dutch government.

On Saturday Google updated Chrome to do the same.

Story Link: http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9219727/Hackers_steal_SSL_certificates_for_CIA_MI6_Mossad?taxonomyId=17&pageNumber=1

© 2012 G.E. Investigations Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha