Jan 142012
 

 

Everything Old Is New Again

The New York Times
By FARHAD MANJOO

January 11, 2012

 

 

REMEMBER the paperless office, that dream of perfect organization that was peddled by tech companies years ago as a way to sell computers?

 

SCANSNAP S1500 The Fujitsu scanner models ($400, available for PCs and for Macs) can convert your documents into searchable PDF files.

TAPE 2 USB II Grace Digital Audio makes this device as well as a Tape 2 PC unit (both $120). They convert music or information stored on cassette tapes into digital files.

 

 

The dream may still be elusive, but tech marketers knew what they were doing when they decided that paperlessness would appeal to customers. Whether at home or at the office, physical documents are a pain to keep straight. They take time to organize, they take up space, they can’t be searched and they’re easily lost or destroyed.

And it’s not just paper documents: everything created before digital media can add to the problem. The average American household has about 3,000 non-digital photographs and slides squirreled away in closets, according to ScanCafe, a photo-scanning service. And then there are all those books, cassettes and videotapes.

The last time my wife and I moved, we spent at least half our time packing and lifting books. E-readers may be revolutionizing the publishing industry, but their ramifications for the moving business, not to mention chiropractors, will probably be just as significant.

Because hardly anyone wants to throw away that old stuff, the solution is to convert all those snapshots, videos, music, books and documents to more portable, compact and durable digital versions.

Recently, I’ve been testing conversion devices and services, and results have been mixed. I found that a few conversion systems work marvelously, but that transforming one’s old stuff into new stuff can be a painful process.

Of all the media that clogs your house, old paperwork may be the easiest to tackle. All you need is a scanner to turn the documents into digital files.

One economical option is the flatbed scanner, which usually costs less than $80, but beware of the low price. A flatbed requires laying each sheet of paper face down on the scanning eye and waiting 10 to 20 seconds while it is transferred to your computer. Unless longevity runs in your family, don’t bother.

A better option is a sheet-feeding scanner, which allows you to insert a stack of paper. The best of these is the Fujitsu ScanSnap S1500, which I found to be a dream to use. It is about as big as a shoebox and can hold 50 sheets of paper in its scanning tray; press the button and the machine will scan up to 20 pages a minute on both sides.

The S1500 comes in two similar models, one for Windows PCs and one for Macs, and each will convert your documents into searchable PDFs. After a few weekends with this scanner, you can throw away your file cabinet. The only downside is the price: at about $400, the S1500 is much more expensive than more pedestrian scanners. But if you’re drowning in paper, you may find it is a lifeline worth the price.

I had a much harder time turning my movies and music into digital files. There are several gadgets that promise to do this, but I lost many hours of my life wrestling with them. To convert my cassette tapes, I tried the Tape 2 PC, made by Ion Audio, and the Tape 2 USB II, made by Grace Digital Audio, each of which sells for $120. Then there is Ion Audio’s Quick Play Flash, a $70 unit that converts vinyl records to digital files. And I tested the VHS to DVD 5.0 Deluxe, an $80 device by Honestech that connects your VCR to your computer, allowing you to turn videotapes into DVDs. All of these were easy to set up and operate. The Quick Play Flash, in particular, was a breeze because it transforms vinyl albums into digital files without connecting to a computer: you plug in a USB thumb drive to save your music. All the devices also delivered conversions that were relatively faithful to the original; there was some degradation in the conversion process, but the resulting sounds and pictures were not bad.

Yet every video- and music-conversion machine I tested suffered from one major, nearly fatal flaw: they took forever to work. That’s because they operate in real time. To convert a 60-minute cassette tape, you must play the tape for a full 60 minutes while your computer records the music. The same is true of the conversion processes for vinyl and videotapes.

For most people, real-time conversion is not realistic. My wife has a collection of about 150 cassette tapes that she saved from her high school years. If I spent 10 hours every weekend trying to turn her collection of old R.E.M., U2 and Tori Amos tapes into MP3s, it would take me nearly four months to finish. If your music collection runs into the thousands and you want to do real-time conversion, you had better quit reading this and get started right now.

A more sensible alternative is to send it away and have the professionals do it. Many such services are available for photographs, videos and music. I tried two that specialize in photographs and movies, and found both delightful.

 

QUICK PLAY FLASH This Ion Audio unit ($70), which converts vinyl records to digital files, is easy to use because you simply plug in a USB thumb drive to save your music.

The services, ScanCafe of Burlingame, Calif., and DigMyPics of Gilbert, Ariz., have many things in common. They accept almost any photograph or video format you can throw at them: slides, negatives, snapshots, videotapes and even Super 8 movie film. And they not only scan your images, but also employ technicians to correct flaws by balancing colors, removing scratches and undoing red eye.

The turnaround for each is roughly similar. DigMyPics estimates that it takes about two weeks to scan a typical order of 1,000 snapshots; ScanCafe requires about three weeks. And both services offer a nice bonus that saves you the trouble of reviewing your snapshots one by one before you send them in: after they’ve scanned your pictures, you can check your images quickly by scrolling through them online and deciding which ones you do not want. Neither firm will charge for scanning the discarded images, unless you discard more than 20 percent of the total pictures. The major difference between the two services is cost. DigMyPics conducts all its operations in the United States, while ScanCafe outsources part of its scanning and editing to Bangalore, India. Because it saves on labor costs, ScanCafe is significantly cheaper than DigMyPics and other services, charging 29 cents an image for standard snapshots. At DigMyPics, the price is 39 cents, so if you are scanning 1,000 pictures, ScanCafe will save you $100.

Is it safe to ship your photographs and movies to a scanning service? In 2008, a laptop at the DigMyPics plant exploded, sparking a fire that destroyed the building and many customers’ images. Annette Crossen, who owns the business with her husband, Scott, said that the company has since rebuilt its operations, and among other precautions, the plant is now under constant surveillance and has more-advanced fire-protection systems. If customer pictures are damaged or lost, DigMyPics offers restitution up to $100. Naren Dubey, the chief executive of ScanCafe, said that his firm ships customers’ pictures to India in durable containers that are resistant to damage and monitored against theft. And ScanCafe offers up to $1,000 in restitution in case of damage or loss. “We’ve never had to pay out that guarantee,” Mr. Dubey said.

 

Direct Link:  http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/12/garden/new-digital-conversion-devices-home-tech.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha26

Nov 182011
 

Feds lead biggest botnet takedown ever, end massive clickjack fraud
Cripples ‘DNS Changer’ botnet of 4 million machines allegedly controlled by Estonians
By Gregg Keizer
November 10, 2011

Computerworld – The botnet takedown announced Wednesday by the U.S. Department of Justice was the biggest in history, according to a security company that worked with authorities to identify the alleged criminals.

Dubbed “DNS Changer,” the collection of compromised computers numbered over four million machines, or more than twice the size of the Rustock botnet that Microsoft and U.S. law enforcement officials brought to its knees last March.

About a quarter of the bots were Windows PCs and Macs based in the U.S.

Feike Hacquebord, a senior threat researcher at Trend Micro, called the operation the “biggest cybercriminal takedown in history” in a blog post yesterday.

Trend Micro was one of several companies and organizations credited by the FBI for contributing to the investigation leading to the takedown. Others included Mandiant, Neustar, Spamhaus and the University of Alabama at Birmingham’s computer forensics research group.

Preet Bharara, the Manhattan-based U.S. District Attorney in charge of the case, said the fraud conducted with the botnet was “massive and sophisticated.”

On Wednesday, the DOJ charged seven men — six Estonians and one Russian — with 27 counts of wire fraud, money laundering and illegal computer access, alleging that the group operated a lucrative clickjacking scheme that generated over $14 million during a four-year period.

*** [ Six of the defendants resided in Estonia during the operation, which took place from 2007 to 2011. They were Vladimir Tsastsin, Timur Gerassimenko, Dmitri Jegorow, Valeri Aleksejev, Konstantin Poltev and Anton Ivanov. The seventh defendant, Andrey Taame, resided in Russia. ] ***

The malware responsible for hijacking users’ clicks — which were then redirected to hacker-created sites that resembled the real domains — came in a variety of forms, said researchers and authorities.

According to the Internet Storm Center, some of whose security experts were part of a working group that advised the DOJ, the botnet was created with several malware families, including the pernicious TDSS rootkit — also known as “Alureon” — as well as Trojan horses crafted for Mac OS X.

The federal indictment said that the gang infected personal computers by luring users to malicious websites or by duping them into downloading and installing purported video codecs that the scams claimed were necessary to view videos.

Trend Micro, which said it had been tracking the DNS Changer botnet since 2006, added that the alleged criminals updated the malware daily to change the DNS (domain name system) settings of each bot.

The malware also blocked users from updating most installed antivirus software, or receiving operating system patch updates, the indictment alleged.

Along with the arrests in Estonia — the Russian defendant remained at large — the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) shut down over 100 domain and botnet command-and-control (C&C) servers hosted at data centers in New York City and Chicago.

That would have left infected PCs and Macs without a way to connect to the Internet: Seizing the domain servers effectively wiped their road map to the Web’s addresses. Instead, a federal judge approved a plan in which clean DNS servers were deployed by the Internet Systems Consortium (ISC), the non-profit group that maintains the popular BIND DNS open-source software.

ISC will operate the replacement DNS servers for 120 days, long enough, authorities said Wednesday, for users and Internet service providers (ISPs) to identify and scrub infected computers of the DNS Changer malware.

Unlike other botnet takedowns, such as the one aimed at Coreflood earlier this year, the DOJ will not remotely clean infected systems.

The FBI has posted instructions (download PDF) that people can use to determine whether their DNS records have been scrambled by the alleged hackers.

The agency has also created a tool that checks for DNS settings that may be among those controlled by the gang.

Microsoft, which has assisted in several botnet takedowns this year but did not participate in what authorities yesterday described as “Operation Ghost Click,” praised the botnet crippling.

“We commend the FBI and Department of Justice for the arrests, which we see as progress in the ongoing effort to hold cybercriminals accountable for their actions,” Microsoft said in a statement late Wednesday.

Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld

Direct Link: http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9221699/Feds_lead_biggest_botnet_takedown_ever_end_massive_clickjack_fraud?taxonomyId=82&pageNumber=1