University of Maine Hacked

 

1,175 Social Security numbers and 435 credit card numbers may have been accessed.

eSecurityPlanet News
By Jeff Goldman
May 11, 2012

 

 

The University of Maine recently stated that hackers had breached a university server, resulting in the possible exposure of as many as 1,175 Social Security numbers and 435 credit card numbers.

“John Gregory, executive director of Information Technologies at UMaine, said Thursday that the Computer Connection, the computer store involved in the breach, primarily serves the Orono campus,” The Kennebec Journal reports. “It is possible that students from other campuses, including the University of Maine at Augusta, could purchase computers from there, but Gregory said it wouldn’t make up a large part of the store’s business.”

The server also provided services to a computer store at the University of Arkansas, potentially affecting over a thousand customers there as well. “However, university officials are continuing to investigate the matter and believe that once it completes its analysis, the actual number of affected customers will be smaller,” according to a University of Arizona press release. “At this time, a review shows that seven customers’ complete credit card numbers were located in the breached data server, with one customer being a unit of the university. Significantly, no security codes or other sensitive authentication data were stored on the server for any customers, officials said.”

“The Maine State Police Computer Crimes Unit, FBI, UMaine police and information technology staff at the University of Maine System and its flagship campus are investigating the server security breach,” writes Bangor Daily News’ Nick McCrea. “Investigators are working with AllClear ID’s Identity Protection Network to notify affected customers.”

“The University of Maine also experienced a computer security breach in 2010, when hackers allegedly accessed personal data of an estimated 4,585 students from the campus Counseling Center,” Mainebiz reports. “Forensic analysis ultimately revealed that no personal data was uploaded or shared.”

 

Direct Link:   http://www.esecurityplanet.com/hackers/university-of-maine-hacked.html

 

Anonymous Drives Security Fears, But Not Spending

Information security budgets remain focused on stopping malware and advanced persistent threats (APTs), which tend to do more damage in the long run than hacktivists’ SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

InformationWeek
By Mathew J. Schwartz
April 23, 2012

Anonymous: 10 Facts About The Hacktivist Group
Anonymous: 10 Facts About The Hacktivist Group
>>> click image for larger view and for slideshow <<<<<<

Who are the groups voted most likely to lob cyber attacks at companies over the next six months? That would be the hacktivist set, including Anonymous, LulzSec Reborn, and their ilk.So said 61% of 1,900 IT and information security personnel recently surveyed by endpoint security firm Bit9. Interestingly, however, the survey also found that actual information security program spending doesn’t track this threat analysis.

Instead, most businesses are devoting the majority of their security resources to stopping what they see as the most prevalent attack techniques: malware (for 45%), as well as spear phishing (16%). Interestingly, both of these types of attacks–often used as part of advanced persistent threats (APTs)–are the hallmark not of hacktivists, but rather criminal enterprises, nation states, or sometimes even competitors. Although only 20% of respondents overall ranked corporate competitors as their most likely attackers in the next six months, one-third of all European respondents listed corporate espionage as their top threat concern.

 

>>>  Read 10 Strategies To Fight Anonymous DDoS Attacks. <<<<<<<

 

Businesses spent markedly less to battle typical hacktivist attack vectors, such as SQL injection hacks or distributed denial-of-service (DDOS) attacks.

 

Why do companies fear Anonymous but spend more to stop malware and spear phishing? “My takeaway is that people are definitely more aware of the threat landscape we face, more than ever before. And Verizon’s 2012 data breach report, for the first time ever, said that Anonymous or hacktivist organizations represented more than half of all the database records stolen in 2011. So it’s not just fear,” said Harry Sverdlove, CTO of Bit9.

Businesses, of course, are worried about seeing their name featured on newspaper front pages thanks to Anonymous hacking their servers, then very publicly releasing stolen records into the public domain. Even so, APTs are likely to be much more damaging to the business over the long term.

“The difference is, if you’re attacked by a hacktivist organization, you might see your data posted immediately to the Web,” Sverdlove said. “If you’re attacked by a criminal enterprise, you might start seeing a trickle of compromised accounts after a few months. If you’re attacked by a nation state, you might never find out about that.”

Which parts of the IT infrastructure concern security personnel most? More than half of survey respondents characterized the weakest technology link in their IT program as the infrastructure servers, including domain controllers, DNS servers, and credential servers. Respondents were concerned, but less so, with their other servers–file, database, Web, email–and endpoints.

What’s the best way to improve a business’s information security posture? According to a majority of respondents, the secret is simple: follow security best practices, create better security policies, and enforce them. Interestingly, only 15% said that better technology would have the biggest impact on their security programs. Only 7% believe that government regulations and law enforcement would have the biggest impact on improving their cyber security.

 

More Security Insights

Webcasts

More >>

 

White Papers

More >>

 

Reports

More >>

 

Direct Link:  http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/attacks/232900691

 

Two More Mac Trojans Discovered

Two benign Trojans target Apple’s Mac OS exploiting the same Java flaw patched last week.

Computer World
By Jared Newman
April 16, 2012

 

PC World –

Following the outbreak of the Flashback Mac Trojan, security researchers have spotted two more cases of Mac OS X malware. The good news is most users have little reason to worry about them.

Both cases are variants on the same Trojan, called SabPub, Kaspersky Lab Expert Costin Raiu wrote on Securelist.

(See Related: Flashback Malware Puts Apple in Security Spotlight: Experts Weigh In)

The first variant is known as Backdoor.OSX.SabPub.a. Like Flashback, this new threat was likely spread through Java exploits on Websites, and allows for remote control of affected systems. It was created roughly one month ago.

Fortunately, this malware isn’t a threat to most users for a few reasons: It may have only been used in targeted attacks, Raiu wrote, with links to malicious Websites sent via e-mail, and the domain used to fetch instructions for infected Macs has since been shut down.

Furthermore, Apple’s security update for Flashback helps render future Java-based attacks harmless. In addition to removing the Flashback malware, the update automatically deactivates the Java browser plug-in and Java Web Start if they remain unused for 35 days. Users must then manually re-enable Java when they encounter applets on a Web page or a Web Start application.

The second SabPub variant is old-school compared to its sibling. Instead of attacking through malicious Websites, it uses infected Microsoft Word documents as vector, distributed by e-mail.

Like the other SabPub variant, this one was used only in targeted attacks, possibly against Tibetan activists. So unless you’re working with a pro-Tibet organization–and you have a habit of opening suspicious Word documents–there’s little reason for alarm. At most, SabPub is more evidence that Macs aren’t immune to attacks–a point that Flashback already made perfectly clear.

 

Direct Link:  http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9226234/Two_More_Mac_Trojans_Discovered?taxonomyId=85

 

Weak passwords still the downfall of enterprise security

A pet’s name or a favorite movie just isn’t enough

Computer World
By Jaikumar Vijayan
April 12, 2012

Computerworld –

A recent data breach that exposed the Social Security numbers of more than 255,000 people in Utah has once again highlighted the longstanding but often underestimated risks posed to organizations by weak and default passwords.

The breach, involving a Medicaid server at the Utah Department of Health, resulted from a configuration error at the authentication layer of the server hosting the compromised data, according to state IT officials.

Many security analysts see that as a somewhat euphemistic admission by the state that the breached server was using a default administrative password or an easily guessable one. By taking advantage of the error, the attackers were able to bypass the perimeter-, network- and application-level security controls that IT administrators had put in place to protect the data on the server.

Such mistakes, though relatively easy to avoid, are surprisingly common.

 

What I think we are seeing is really what I like to call ‘the curse of the reusable password.’
Gartner analyst John Pescatore

In March, the inspector general of the U.S. Department of Energy released the results of an information security audit at the Bonneville Power Administration, which provides about 30% of wholesale power to regional utilities in the Pacific Northwest. According to the audit, vulnerability scans of nine applications used to support key financial, HR and security management functions at Bonneville identified 11 servers that had been configured with easily guessable passwords.

An attacker taking advantage of those vulnerabilities would have been able to gain complete access to the system. Four servers were configured to allow any remote user to access and modify shared files. One server hosted an administrator account that was protected only with a default password.

Earlier this month, a data breach at payment processing company Global Payments that exposed credit- and debit-card data belonging to about 1.5 million people was believed by analyst firm Gartner to have resulted from a weak authentication mechanism that allowed attackers to gain access to an administrative account. An attack on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce by Chinese hackers and a compromise of the open-source WineHQ database last year are also believed to have originated with compromised administrator accounts.

An enterprise can have anywhere from hundreds to thousands of account names and passwords. Many of these accounts often have privileged access to applications, databases, networks and operating systems. While not all of them are always critical to the enterprise, there are numerous accounts that, if abused, can cause serious disruptions enterprisewide.

Previous studies have shown that the number of people who require administrative access to a system for maintenance purposes, or for completing tasks such as patching and upgrading, is often far greater than the number that managers know about or track. Nevertheless, many companies allow users and administrators to apply easy passwords or even default passwords to protect access to such accounts.

When multifactor authentication is used, the measures often involve relatively easy-to-crack knowledge-based authentication (KBA) mechanisms where a user is prompted for an answer to a security question, such as a first pet’s name or the name of a favorite movie.

A report released by Verizon last month showed that attacks exploiting weak passwords are still endemic in the retail and hospitality industries. Attackers can still go to a vendor’s site, get a client list and “just hit those [clients] with the default or guessable username-password combination,” Verizon noted in its report. “These are relatively easy attacks that require little in-depth knowledge or creativity.”

The tendency by many people to use the same password for multiple accounts is another huge issue, said John Pescatore, a Gartner analyst.

“A lot of Anonymous’ recent success has been in attacks where they have obtained users’ passwords to external services and then found the same passwords in use at sensitive internal applications or in email systems,” Pescatore said. “What I think we are seeing is really what I like to call ‘the curse of the reusable password.’ “

One of the most important measures companies can take to ramp up their security is to raise the bar for passwords and authentication mechanisms, he said. “Similar to how you can’t shift from ‘Park’ to ‘Drive’ without putting your foot on the brake, there ought to be ‘safety interlocks’ in any piece of software that make it very hard to shift into Drive without changing the default password,” he said.

Adam Bosnian, executive vice president of corporate development at Cyber-Ark, a vendor of software for managing administrative passwords, said the problem that companies face is complex. While it’s one thing to require that administrators use complex passwords, it’s another thing to manage those passwords, he said. What often happens is that multiple administrators might need access to one system, and it is easiest to use a default or easily remembered password to control access to it.

When a complex password is used, administrators need to have three processes: One for securely sharing that password with each other, another process for changing the password when needed, and a third for keeping everyone informed about the changes. These processes can get especially difficult in larger organizations where the number of privileged accounts can be staggering, he said.

“The truth is, anyone trying to protect non-trivial assets should be using multifactor authentication and/or complementary controls to protect themselves,” said Peter Lindstrom, an analyst with Spire Security. “The password has too many weaknesses, including the obvious human ones,” he said.

Most password schemes that aren’t protected by another form of authentication or lockout controls are susceptible to brute-force compromise, where automated tools are used to guess passwords, he said. “At this stage of the IT game, there is really no excuse for using default passwords.”

 

Jaikumar Vijayan covers data security and privacy issues, financial services security and e-voting for Computerworld

 

Direct Link:  http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9226152/Weak_passwords_still_the_downfall_of_enterprise_security_?taxonomyId=82

 

‘Anonymous’ Hacker Brags On Twitter And Gets Caught

MediaBistro
By Mary Long
April 17, 2012

(Man with mask photo from Shutterstock)

 

We imagine that one of the hardest parts about being an ‘Anonymous’ hacker is remaining anonymous. We’re not talking about shielding your identity from authorities, as they seem to have that pretty wrapped up, we mean not bragging to folks that you’re one of the masterminds behind the mayhem. Seems a few hackers struggle with just that – like Anonymous hacker, John Anthony Borell III. He got sloppy on Twitter and now he’s in a world of trouble for it.

The Toledo Blade tells us that 21 year-old John Anthony Borell III, of Toledo, Ohio was arraigned Monday in federal court in Salt Lake City. He has been charged with hacking into the websites of the Utah Chiefs of Police Association and the Salt Lake City Police Department, then taking credit for the attacks on Twitter, according to a federal indictment.

The two counts of computer intrusion, prosecutors say, consisted of Borell intruding on the chiefs’ website server Jan. 19, and then breaking into the police department’s website Jan. 31. The administrator of the Utah chiefs’ website estimates the group spent $150,000 to mitigate the attack.

There’s a pastebin document circulating on Twitter, with the hashtag “#doingitrite: Tips on Staying Anonymous.” (Pastebin is where hackers typically share victims’ information publicly.)

Over the past month, we’ve witnessed a heap of Anons getting v&, most notably sup_g, Kahuna and W0rmer.

The only positive to come out of these arrests is that all Anons should learn not to be so easily socially engineered from now on. sup_g, Kahuna and W0rmer all contributed a lot to the cause and they will not be forgotten – but in spite of their talents, they left glaring clues to their identities all over the web. The feds didn’t catch them by using l33t whitehack skillz – the Anons effectively unmasked themselves.

Anyone who’s serious about remaining anonymous should learn from these indictments to avoid making the same mistakes. It doesn’t matter how good a hacker you are – if you’re DM’ing pictures of yourself to femanons, you might as well just hand yourself in to the feds now.

The piece goes on to highlight each user’s “fatal mistakes, as highlighted in their indictments.” Relevant to Kahuna, he allegedly did the following:

  • Used ‘anonJB’ as one of his IRC names – JB are his real-life initials
  • Continued to operate as ‘anonJB’ after being correctly doxed in September 2011: http://pastie.org/2477266
  • Hacked websites using his work IP
  • Had Facebook, Gmail, Twitter and YouTube accounts in his real name. These revealed his Anon sympathies IRL, including a link to an Anonymous educational video: http://www.youtube.com/user/jborell3
  • Retweeted Anon accounts from his own real-life Twitter (no crime, but hardly a smart move when you’re also an Anon)
  • Mentioned on IRC that his dad was a lawyer (the chat log was later leaked)
  • Accessed the @ItsKahuna Twitter account on occasions using his home IP
  • Tweeted news of his neighbors installing a new WEP router that he was accessing
  • Tweeted as @ItsKahuna to say he was fixing his friend’s computer. The IP address this tweet was posted from matched one of his Facebook friends IRL.
  • F***ed up and allowed details concerning his computer host to be revealed on air – he then DM’d KSL TV to ask for this incriminating evidence to be deleted from later broadcasts. DM’d pictures of his face to @anoncutie. All of Kahuna’s tweets, DMs and IP logs were later revealed when feds subpoenaed Twitter.

In case you’re wondering, the other hacker listed above, W0rmer, was caught when he tweeted a taunt to his online victims along with a photo of his girlfriend’s chest. Turns out the tweet, posted from his iPhone, “contained GPS data pointing directly to his house.”

The young man’s Twitter account, ItsKahuna, is still pretty active, as is the hashtag #FreeKahuna, with one individual (who is listed in the indictment) changing her displayed name to the #FreeKahuna hashtag. And if it IS the same young man tweeting from this account, we wonder if he’s learned much from this ordeal?

 

 

 

What do you think?

If you were a hacker would you be able to keep it to yourself?

Or would you get caught bragging on Twitter like these guys did?

 

 

Direct Link:  http://www.mediabistro.com/alltwitter/hacker-brags-on-twitter_b21136

 

 

 

 

Anonymous hacks into tech and telecom sites

Two trade association sites that boast members such as Apple, Microsoft, IBM, AT&T, and Verizon come under attack by hackers for supporting cybersecurity legislation.

 

CNET News

by Dara Kerr

 

 

 

Anonymous is certainly making the rounds this week.

First China, now the telecom and tech industry.

The hacker group has claimed responsibility for leading denial-of-service attacks on two technology trade association Web sites, USTelecom and TechAmerica, according to Bloomberg. Anonymous is reportedly lashing out because these organizations support a cybersecurity bill that some members of congress are working to pass.

The attacks began yesterday when users were unable to log onto the sites, reports Bloomberg. USTelecom represents telecom companies, including AT&T, Verizon, and CenturyLink; and TechAmerica’s members include tech companies such as IBM, Microsoft, and Apple.

Both sites say that technicians are working to restore service for their users. Despite the high-profile companies that the sites represent, both organizations told Bloomberg they don’t host any sensitive information.

 The legislation that Anonymous is opposed to is a bipartisan bill referred to as the Rogers-Ruppersberger Cyber Security Bill. The bill is being put forth to “help the private sector defend itself from advanced cyber threats,” according to Rep. Mike Rogers’ Web site.

Both organizations seem undeterred by the attacks. USTelecom President Walter McCormick told Bloomberg that the hacks stifled free speech and Internet norms, while TechAmerica President Shawn Osborne said his organization will continue to support the legislation.

“These types of strong-arm tactics have no place in the critical discussions our country needs to be having about our cybersecurity, they just underscore the importance of them,” Osborne told Bloomberg.

 

Related stories

 

Dara Kerr, a freelance journalist based in the Bay Area, is fascinated by robots, supercomputers and Internet memes. When not writing about technology and modernity, she likes to travel to far-off countries. She is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Originally posted at Digital Media

 

Direct Link:  http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57411619-83/anonymous-hacks-into-tech-and-telecom-sites/

 

 

Hacker steals data on 780,000 Utahns from state computer

 

 USA TODAY

By Michael Winter

April 9, 2012

A computer hacker stole Social Security numbers for 280,000 Utahns and swiped names, addresses and birth dates for 500,000 others, state officials said today.

 

Utah Department of Technology Services

Officials announced the dramatically higher estimates at a news conference, the Salt Lake Tribune reports. Utahns covered by Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) who sought health care in the past four months are the most likely victims of the identify theft, officials said.

They first believed that the data theft, which occurred late April 1, involved only 24,000 Medicaid payment claims or eligibility inquiries. That estimate grew to more than 182,000 and included people covered by CHIP, among others.

A hacker traced to Eastern Europe first accessed a weakly protected computer server at the Utah Department of Health on March 30. The thief downloaded about 224,000 files, some of which contained hundreds of records, said health department spokesman Tom Huduchko, the Associated Press says. The breach was discovered April 2.

In a statement, the Department of Technology Services explained that a “configuration error occurred at the password authentication level, allowing the hacker to circumvent DTS’s security system.”

The stolen Social Security numbers did not include other personal information, he said. But the files had other data for 500,000 additional individuals.

The DTS noted in an FAQ (pdf) that claims payment and eligibility inquiries “contain sensitive, personal health information from individuals and health care providers. Such information could include Social Security numbers, names, dates of birth, addresses, diagnosis codes, national provider identification numbers, provider taxpayer identification numbers, and billing codes.”

The revised figure means that roughly one in four Utahns may have had their individual information compromised.

State officials will be contacting affected residents. Those whose Social Security numbers were stolen will receive a year of free credit-record monitoring. The news release has more information.

 

Direct Link:   http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/04/hacker-steals-data-on-780k-from-utah-state-computer/1?csp=34news#.T4ZNqNmWtI5

 

Microsoft Patches Critical Windows Zero-day Bug That Hackers Are Now Exploiting

 

Computerworld

By Gregg Keizer

April 10, 2012

 

 

Microsoft Patches Critical Windows Zero-day Bug That Hackers Are Now Exploiting

 

 

Microsoft today delivered six security updates to patch 11 vulnerabilities in Windows, Internet Explorer (IE), Office and several other products, including one bug that attackers are already exploiting.

The company also issued the first patch for Windows 8 Consumer Preview, the beta-like build Microsoft released at the end of February.

But it was MS12-027 that got the most attention today.

“Things got a bit more interesting today,” said Andrew Storms, director of security operations at nCircle Security, “because Microsoft is reporting limited attacks in the wild.”

Flaws that attackers exploit before a patch is available are called “zero-day” vulnerabilities.

The single vulnerability patched in MS12-027 is in an ActiveX control included with every 32-bit version of Office 2003, 2007 and 2010; Microsoft also called out SQL Server, Commerce Server, BizTalk Server, Visual FoxPro and Visual Basic as needing the patch.

Storms, other security experts and Microsoft, too, all identified MS12-027 as the first update users should install.

Hackers are already using the vulnerability in malformed text documents, which when opened either in Word or WordPad — the latter is a bare bones text editor bundled with every version of Windows, including Windows 7 — can hijack a PC, Microsoft acknowledged in a post to its Security Research & Defense (SRD) blog today.

“We list MS12-027 as our highest priority security update to deploy this month because we are aware of very limited, targeted attacks taking advantage of [the] CVE-2012-0158 vulnerability using specially-crafted Office documents,” said Elia Florio, an engineer with the Microsoft Security Response Center, in the SRD blog post.

Microsoft did not disclose when it first became aware of the attacks, or who reported the vulnerability to its security team.

Storms speculated that an individual or company had been attacked, uncovered the bug and notified Microsoft.

Microsoft rarely deploys a patch “out of cycle,” meaning outside its usual second Tuesday of every month schedule. The last such update was shipped in December 2011, and was the first for that year.

Also affected is software written by third-party developers who have bundled the buggy ActiveX control with their code or called it. Those developers will have to provide their own updates to customers.

“Any developer that has released an ActiveX control should review the information for this security bulletin,” said Jason Miller, manager of research and development at VMware. “These developers may need to release updates to their own software to ensure they are not using a vulnerable file in their ActiveX control.”

Attackers can also exploit this bug using “drive-by download” attacks that automatically trigger the vulnerability when IE users browse to a malicious site, Microsoft admitted.

That means the flaw patched by MS12-027 is a double threat. “There are two attack scenarios. There’s the malicious website [scenario] and then RTF documents, which are pretty common,” Miller said.

Miller expects to see attackers glom onto the vulnerability once they have a chance to analyze the bug and craft their own exploits. “More and more will jump on this this month,” Miller argued.

Wolfgang Kandek, chief technology officer at Qualys, agreed. “Now that [the advisory] is published, other malware authors will be looking at it to see what’s there,” Kandek said. “We’re sure to see more attacks against this vulnerability.”

Eight of the 11 bugs patched today — including the one in MS12-027 — were rated “critical” by Microsoft, its highest threat ranking. Another was pegged “important,” and the remaining two were tagged as “moderate.”

Microsoft identified MS12-023, a five-patch fix for IE, as the other update to roll out ASAP.

The company typically releases an IE security update in even-numbered months; on those months, security professionals usually recommend that users apply the browser update first.

Not this month.

“MS12-027 trumps the IE update this month,” said Miller.

Storms also remarked on the downgrading of the IE bulletin. “When has there been a month when IE hasn’t been the one to patch first?” Storms asked. “I can’t remember one.”

 

Patches for IE9

Two of the five vulnerabilities in MS12-023 were rated critical for IE9, the newest edition of Microsoft’s browser that runs on Windows Vista and Windows 7.

Other bulletins today applied to Windows, .NET, Microsoft’s VPN (virtual private networking) tool and Office 2007 and the ancient — and no longer sold — Microsoft Works.

Miller pointed out that MS12-024, which patches a critical vulnerability in all supported versions of Windows, also applies to Windows 8 Consumer Preview.

Although the MS12-024 advisory does not mention Windows 8 Consumer Preview, anyone running that sneak peek will be offered the update, said Miller. Computerworld confirmed that MS12-024 was among several other non-security fixes Microsoft delivered to Windows 8 today.

According to Qualys, the bug in MS12-024 lets hackers hitch a ride inside legitimate software installation packages.

Amol Sarwate, manager of Qualys’ vulnerability research lab, said the vulnerability would be very attractive to purveyors of phony antivirus software, a category often called “scareware” or “rogueware.”

April’s six security updates can be downloaded and installed via the Microsoft Update and Windows Update services, as well as through Windows Server Update Services.

 

Similar Articles:

 

Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld.

 

Direct Link:  http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/253558/microsoft_patches_critical_windows_zeroday_bug_that_hackers_are_now_exploiting.html

 

Apple Mac Computers Hit in Hacker Attack, Researcher Says

Bloomberg
By Jordan Robertson 
Apr 5, 2012

More than 600,000 Apple Inc. (AAPL) Mac computers were affected by a hacking attack, a sign that the once rarely targeted company is becoming a bigger focus for people intent on spreading malware, a security-research firm said.

The attack affects computers running Apple’s Mac OS X software, according to Russian antivirus software maker Doctor Web. Most of the infected computers are in the United States (X) and Canada, the firm said in a blog posting. Apple fixed a security hole this week that let the malicious software spread. Users who haven’t downloaded the necessary updates are vulnerable, Doctor Web said.

Apple computers in London. Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg

 

“This once again refutes claims by some experts that there are no cyber-threats to Mac OS X,” Doctor Web said. Apple spokesman Bill Evans declined to comment on the hacker attack. He noted that there are 63 million Macs in use worldwide.

Macs have historically been an unappealing hacking target because of their low market share. Instead, criminals have attacked personal computers running Microsoft Corp.’s Windows software, seeking the biggest number of victims for illicit moneymaking schemes. Windows runs on more than 90 percent of the world’s desktop computers, according to market researcher Net Applications.

The attack that Doctor Web analyzed is an especially harmful variety that infects computers without user interaction. To get hit, users just need to visit a poisoned webpage and the infection happens silently in the background. The vulnerability that allows the attack to take place exists in Java, the widely used programming language for building web pages.

 

Security Patch

Boris Sharov, Doctor Web’s chief executive officer, said in an interview that the spread of the infection appears to have leveled off at around 600,000 computers, a sign of the effectiveness of the security patch. He pointed to a Doctor Web page for detecting and removing the malicious software, which is called BackDoor.Flashback.39.

The malicious software first appeared in September and has gone through a number of transformations since then, targeting Macs and generally being used to steal personal information such as passwords, according to Liam O Murchu, a manager of security- response operations at Symantec Corp.

“It just shows that no matter what operating system you’re using, you can be at risk,” he said in a phone interview today. “No one is immune.”

 

Direct Link:  http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-05/apple-mac-computers-affected-by-hacker-attack-researcher-says.html

 

Hacker Pleads Guilty in Sony Pictures Computer Break-In

 

According to an indictment in the case, Culver City-based Sony’s computer system was hacked last year by the group known as LulzSec.

 

 

 

A member of a computer hacking group pleaded guilty today in Los Angeles to federal charges of breaking into Sony Pictures Entertainment’s system.

Cody Andrew Kretsinger, 24, entered pleas to one count each of conspiracy and unauthorized impairment of a protected computer, according to Assistant U.S. Attorney Eric Vandevelde.

Kretsinger, a Phoenix resident, faces up to 15 years in prison at sentencing July 26, the prosecutor said.

According to an indictment in the case, Culver City-based Sony’s computer system was hacked from May 27 through June 2 last year by the group known as LulzSec, or Lulz Security, whose members anonymously claimed responsibility on the group’s website.

Kretsinger admitted in court Thursday to being a member of the group, Vandevelde said.

The indictment accused Kretsinger and co-conspirators of stealing confidential information from Sony Pictures’ computer systems and distributing the material on LulzSec’s website before trumpeting the attack on Twitter.

The breach caused more than $600,000 in damages, according to court papers.

LulzSec is known for its affiliation with the international hacking collective known as Anonymous, which conducts cyber attacks and disseminates information stolen from individuals and companies perceived to be hostile to its interests, officials said.

 

Direct Link:  http://culvercity.patch.com/articles/hacker-pleads-guilty-in-sony-pictures-computer-break-in

© 2012 G.E. Investigations Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha