Mar 272013
 

MI5 and industry join forces to fight cybercrime

Fusion cell to be set up at secret location in London to analyse online threats to the UK

The Guardian / UK
March 27, 2013

 

Intelligence agencies will work alongside the private sector to combat cybercrime. Photograph: Martin Rogers / Workbook Stock

Intelligence agencies will work alongside the private sector to combat cybercrime. Photograph: Martin Rogers / Workbook Stock

Cyber-security experts from industry are to operate alongside the intelligence agencies for the first time in an attempt to combat the growing online threat to British firms.

The government is creating a so-called fusion cell where analysts from MI5 and GCHQ, the domestic eavesdropping agency, will work with private sector counterparts.

The cell is part of the Cyber Security Information Sharing Partnership (Cisp), launched on Wednesday, to provide industry with a forum to share details of techniques used by hackers as well as methods of countering them.

At any one time there will be about 12 to 15 analysts working at the cell, based at an undisclosed location in London.

“What the fusion cell will be doing is pulling together a single, richer intelligence picture of what is going on in cyberspace and the threats attacking the UK,” a senior official said.

“What we are trying to do is get that better intelligence picture and push it out to industry in a way that they can take action on, so it is very action-orientated.”

Although the industry representatives will not have direct access to classified intelligence material, they will face security vetting.

The Cisp initiative grew out of talks in 2011 between industry and David Cameron. It led to a pilot project last year involving 80 leading companies, codenamed Programme Auburn. It will be expanded to cover 160 firms from the finance, defence, energy, telecoms and pharmaceutical sectors.

With companies reluctant to discuss cyber-attacks or breaches of security in public, officials acknowledge that confidentiality is crucial, so companies involved will not be named.

“Everything about information-sharing has to be based on trust,” another official said. “Most companies still remain cautious about talking about the cyber threats they face in public.”

The firms will have access to a secure web portal, described as a “Facebook for cyber-security threats”, run on social network lines, where they can choose who they share information with.

It is expected that other firms will be invited to join as the scheme develops, although officials stressed that future expansion would be at a pace consistent with maintaining trust and confidentiality.

Launching the scheme, the Cabinet Office minister, Francis Maude, said the government was determined to make Britain one of the safest places to do business in cyberspace.

“We know that cyber-attacks are happening on an industrial scale and businesses are by far the biggest victims of cybercrime in terms of industrial espionage and intellectual property theft, with losses to the UK economy running into billions of pounds annually,” he said.

“This innovative partnership is breaking new ground through a truly collaborative partnership for sharing information on threats and to protect UK interests in cyberspace.”

Direct Link:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/mar/27/mi5-industry-join-forces-cyber-crime

 

Mar 272013
 

Anti-cyber threat centre launched


BBC News / UK

By Gordon Corera
Security correspondent, BBC News
March 26, 2013

Cyber attack can cost companies profits and value

Cyber attack can cost companies profits and value

A new initiative to share information on cyber threats between businesses and government is to be launched.

It will include experts from government communications body GCHQ, MI5, police and business and aims to better co-ordinate responses to the threats.

There will be a secure web-portal to allow access to shared information in real time, like a “secure Facebook”.

UK networks are attacked by other states, criminals and companies seeking secrets, costing billions of pounds.

In 2012, the head of MI5 Jonathan Evans said the scale of attacks was “astonishing”.

One major London listed company had incurred revenue losses of £800m as a result of cyber attack from a hostile state because of commercial disadvantage in contractual negotiations.

One government official told the BBC: “No one has full visibility on cyberspace threats. We see volumes of attack increase and we expect it to continue to rise.”

The plan – the Cyber Security Information Sharing Partnership (CISP) – has emerged out of a 2012 pilot scheme known as Project Auburn.

Eighty companies from five sectors of the economy – finance, defence, energy, telecommunications and pharmaceuticals – were encouraged to share information.

The pilot was expanded to 160 firms. A more permanent structure is being announced on Wednesday.

The kind of information shared includes technical details of an attack, methods used in planning it and how to mitigate and deal with one.

At a new London base, large screens will monitor attacks and provide details in real-time of who is being targeted.

A group of 12-15 analysts with security clearance will work mainly during office hours.

Companies previously have been nervous of revealing publicly when they have been attacked because of the potential impact on reputation and share price if they are seen as having lost valuable intellectual property or other information.

It is hoped further firms will join the initial 160.

Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude said: “We know cyber attacks are happening on an industrial scale and businesses are by far the biggest victims in terms of industrial espionage and intellectual property theft, with losses to the UK economy running into the billions of pounds annually.

“This innovative partnership is breaking new ground through a truly collaborative partnership for sharing information on threats and to protect UK interests in cyberspace.”

Government officials say they continue to be uncomfortable with an EU draft directive which would force companies to disclose when they have been attacked.

They hope a voluntary partnership will provide a more workable solution.
Direct Link:  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21945702

Mar 132012
 

One-Hour DNA Tests Headed to ‘Select Customers’ this Summer

 

Security Management News

By Carlton Purvis

03/07/2012

 

 

 

 

Lockheed Martin and ZyGEM, a forensics company, unveiled a new rapid DNA testing technology  that they say can help identify suspects, aid in disaster recovery efforts, and eventually reduce rape-kit backlogs. Kits will be distributed to agencies this summer, the companies announced at a recent Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences.

Last July, an appeals court ruled that police officers can collect DNA via cheek swab from suspects even if they haven’t been charged or convicted of a crime. But even though DNA collection is allowed, ZyGEM CEO Paul Kinnon said, a lot of times agencies don’t have the technology to do it. This new technology would allow them to do it in-house, without having to ship DNA to a regional lab and wait for a response.

“With the successful development of our fully-integrated cartridge device, this platform now has the potential to transform today’s DNA identification process from one that takes a great deal of training, sophisticated equipment , and time into a far simpler, more affordable process that can be performed in the lab or field in under 90 minutes,” said Joan Bienvenue, Lockheed Martin program manager and chief scientist.

The prototype was announced in 2010. Two years later, the companies have plans to release the DNA identification solution this summer to “select customers” in homeland security, law enforcement, and research fields.

It starts with a cheek swab. A police officer can swab a suspect and deposit the sample into a cartridge that is inserted into a processor that can provide a DNA profile in about 90 minutes. That profile can be matched against existing profiles or stored in a database. The system is designed so that it doesn’t take any special training to use.

“So a professional forensic person can use it. A semi-trained lab tech could use it. Also a police officer and military person can use it,” Kinnon said by phone on Wednesday. “This is a decentralized solution to a centralized problem. Anyone can do this wherever they are and get it in real time rather than having to wait two or three days” – the time it would take for a sample to travel to a lab and return.

Kinnon says hardware for the solution would cost around the same as current technology, but agencies could save money because all testing could be done in-house and there would be no wait for results. The technology could also be used in establishing paternity or identifying remains in a disaster relief situation. The technology isn’t  currently optimized to process rape kits, but it’s an application that is being explored for the future.

Judges in last year’s ruling said collecting DNA samples doesn’t violate constitutional protections and that DNA information was just a 21st century version of fingerprints. ZyGEM and Lockheed Martin just want to provide a faster way to run the “prints.”

 

Direct Link:  http://securitymanagement.com/news/one-hour-dna-tests-headed-select-customers-summer-009655

Feb 292012
 

FBI Turns Off Thousands of GPS Devices After Supreme Court Ruling

 

 

Wall Street Journal

By Julia Angwin

February 25, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Supreme Court’s recent ruling overturning the warrantless use of GPS tracking devices has caused a “sea change” inside the U.S. Justice Department, according to FBI General Counsel Andrew Weissmann.

Mr. Weissmann, speaking at a University of San Francisco conference called “Big Brother in the 21st Century” on Friday, said that the court ruling prompted the FBI to turn off about 3,000 GPS tracking devices that were in use.

These devices were often stuck underneath cars to track the movements of the car owners. In U.S. v. Jones, the Supreme Court ruled that using a device to track a car owner without a search warrant violated the law.

After the ruling, the FBI had a problem collecting the devices that it had turned off, Mr. Weissmann said. In some cases, he said, the FBI sought court orders to obtain permission to turn the devices on briefly – only in order to locate and retrieve them.

Mr. Weissmann said that the FBI is now working to develop new guidelines for the use of GPS devices. He said the agency is also working on guidelines to cover the broader implications of the court decision beyond GPS devices.

For instance, he said, agency is now “wrestling” with the legality of whether agents can lift up the lid of a trash can without committing trespass. The majority opinion in U.S. v. Jones held that the agents had trespassed when placing the GPS device on a car without warrant.

He said the agency is also considering the implications of the concurring justices – whose arguments were largely based on the idea that a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the totality of their movements, even if those movements are in public.

“From a law enforcement perspective, even though its not technically holding, we have to anticipate how it’s going to go down the road,” Mr. Weissmann said.

 

Direct Link:  http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2012/02/25/fbi-turns-off-thousands-of-gps-devices-after-supreme-court-ruling/

Jan 222012
 

 

Web Gang Operating in the Open

The New York Times
By RIVA RICHMOND
January 16, 2012

Five men believed to be responsible for spreading a notorious computer worm on Facebook and other social networks — and pocketing several million dollars from online schemes — are hiding in plain sight in St. Petersburg, Russia, according to investigators at Facebook and several independent computer security researchers.

 

 

A member of the Koobface gang posted to Foursquare, showing an office, complete with coordinates, in St. Petersburg.

 

The men live comfortable lives in St. Petersburg — and have frolicked on luxury vacations in places like Monte Carlo, Bali and, earlier this month, Turkey, according to photographs posted on social network sites — even though their identities have been known for years to Facebook, computer security investigators and law enforcement officials.

One member of the group, which is popularly known as the Koobface gang, has regularly broadcast the coordinates of its offices by checking in on Foursquare, a location-based social network, and posting the news to Twitter. Photographs on Foursquare also show other suspected members of the group working on Macs in a loftlike room that looks like offices used by tech start-ups in cities around the world.

Beginning in July 2008, the Koobface gang aimed at Web users with invitations to watch a funny or sexy video. Those curious enough to click the link got a message to update their computer’s Flash software, which begins the download of the Koobface malware. Victims’ computers are drafted into a “botnet,” or network of infected PCs, and are sent official-looking advertisements of fake antivirus software and their Web searches are also hijacked and the clicks delivered to unscrupulous marketers. The group made money from people who bought the bogus software and from unsuspecting advertisers.

The security software firm Kaspersky Labs has estimated the network includes 400,000 to 800,000 PCs worldwide at its height in 2010. Victims are often unaware their machines have been compromised.

The Koobface gang’s freedom underscores how hard it is to apprehend international computer criminals, even when identities are known. These groups tend to operate in countries where they can work unmolested by the local authorities, and where cooperation with United States and European law enforcement agencies is poor. Meanwhile, Western law enforcement is awash in computer crime and lacks the resources and skilled manpower to tackle it effectively, especially when evidence putting individuals’ fingers on keyboards must be collected abroad.

On Tuesday, Facebook plans to announce that it will begin sharing information about the group and how to fight them with security researchers and other Internet companies. It believes public namings can make it harder for such groups to operate and send a message to the criminal underground.

None of the men have been charged with a crime and no law enforcement agencies have confirmed they are under investigation.

The group investigators have identified has adopted the tongue-in-cheek name, Ali Baba & 4: Anton Korotchenko, who uses the online nickname “KrotReal”; Stanislav Avdeyko, known as “leDed”; Svyatoslav E. Polichuck, who goes by “PsViat” and “PsycoMan”; Roman P. Koturbach, who uses the online moniker “PoMuc”; and Alexander Koltyshev, or “Floppy.” )

Efforts to contact members of the group for comment have been unsuccessful.

Weeks after early versions of the Koobface worm began appearing on Facebook, investigators inside the company were able to trace the attacks to those responsible. “We’ve had a picture of one of the guys in a scuba mask on our wall since 2008,” said Ryan McGeehan, manager of investigations and incident response at Facebook.

Since then, Facebook and several independent security researchers have provided law enforcement agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, with information and evidence. Most notably, Jan Droemer, a 32-year-old independent researcher in Germany, has provided important information and leads, including a password-free view inside Koobface’s command-and-control system, known as the “Mothership.” Mr. Droemer spent nights and weekends for four months in late 2009 and early 2010 unmasking the gang members using only information available publicly on the Internet.

The F.B.I. declined to comment.

That computer crime pays is fueling a boom that is leaving few Internet users and businesses unscathed. The toll on consumers alone is estimated at $114 billion annually worldwide, according to a September 2011 study by the security software maker Symantec.

Russia, in particular, has a reputation as a hacker haven, although it has pursued several prominent cases against spammers recently. The Soviet education system’s emphasis on math and science combined with post-Communist economic collapse and weak private industry meant there were many highly trained engineers, but few legitimate outlets for their skills, said Vsevolod Gunitskiy, an assistant professor at the University of Toronto.

“Russia is sort of a perfect storm for cybercrime,” he said. The proliferation of organized crime and official corruption created “this very strong legacy of contempt for the laws and general culture of criminality.”

The Russian Embassy in Washington said it does not have any information regarding this group and that American law enforcement officials had never contacted the embassy on this issue.

The men investigators believe are behind Koobface look a lot like ordinary software enthusiasts, albeit with more tattoos and an outlaw persona. Mr. Avdeyko, who is two decades older than the other men and has been tied to an infamous spyware program dating to 2003 called CoolWebSearch, appears to hold a leadership role.

He and at least two of the other men have worked in the world of online pornography, said Mr. Droemer. Mr. Korotchenko and several of the other men apparently tried to run a legitimate mobile software and services business, colorfully named MobSoft Ltd. They did not reply to e-mails requesting interviews.

Mr. Droemer said the gang’s success was more attributable to workaday persistence and willingness to adapt than technical sophistication. They could have spread Koobface to many more PCs, he said. “They could have done a lot more technical things to make it more perfect, more marvelous. But there was just no need to do it. They were just investing as much to get the revenue they wanted to get.”

The group cleverly harnessed the infrastructures of powerful online services — from Facebook and Twitter to Google’s search engine and Blogger — to do the heavy lifting, and may have run its enterprise with just a few computers.

Koobface will probably earn its place in history for pioneering and leading the criminal exploitation of social networks, rather than the size of its profits. Data found in the botnet’s command-and-control system suggests the group has earned at least $2 million a year for the 3 1/2 years of its existence, although the actual total is very likely higher, Mr. Droemer said.

Experts say the gang could have further enriched itself through identity fraud, since it has had access to millions of PCs and social-network profiles, but that there is no evidence it has done so.

Indeed, in a 2009 Christmas e-card to security researchers left inside victim computers, the gang vowed it would never steal credit card or banking information. It called viruses “something awful.” Its tactics have been less ruthless than those of many other hacker groups, experts said. For instance, it has never deployed malicious programs that install automatically, and rather has required its victims to make several unwise clicks.

While the Koobface gang operates freely, Facebook has focused on building elaborate defenses against the worm, which relentlessly struck the site again and again until disappearing in March. The gang abandoned the site after Facebook mounted a major counteroffensive, which included an effort to dismantle the command-and-control system of the botnet and a simultaneous push to scrub its network of the worm and clean up infections in users’ PCs.

“We fired all the different guns at the same time,” said Joe Sullivan, chief security officer at Facebook. “If we could literally shut down the command-and-control, all the infections, and just make them have to start over from scratch in all contexts, we figured they might decide to move on.” He hoped they would conclude Facebook was unprofitable, he said.

But Facebook’s effort and two earlier takedown efforts by security researchers — including one by the Bulgarian researcher Dancho Danchev, who revealed the name of one Koobface member on his blog last week — have failed put an end to Koobface, and smaller sites continue to suffer.

“People who engage in this type of stuff need to know that their name and real identity are going to come out eventually and they’re going to get arrested and they’re going to be targeted,” Mr. Sullivan said. “People are fighting back.”

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: January 19, 2012

An article on Tuesday about the Koobface gang, a Russian group believed to be responsible for spreading a notorious computer worm on social networks, misspelled the surname of one man identified by investigators as a member of the group. He is Alexander Koltyshev, not Koltysehv.

 

Direct Link:  http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/technology/koobface-gang-that-used-facebook-to-spread-worm-operates-in-the-open.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha26