Mar 312013
 

Apple Makes Two Factor Authentication Available for Apple IDs

In an effort to increase security for user accounts, Apple on Thursday introduced a two-step verification option for Apple IDs.

Security Week
by Mike Lennon
March 22, 2013

 

APPLE

APPLE

As the “epic hacking” of Wired journalist Mat Honan proved, an Apple ID often carries much more power than the ability to buy songs and apps through Apple’s App store.  

An Apple ID can essentially be the keys to the Kingdom when it comes to Apple devices and user maintained data, and as Apple explains, is the “ key to many important things you do with Apple, such as purchasing from the iTunes and App Stores, keeping personal information up-to-date across your devices with iCloud, and locating, locking, or wiping your devices.”

Two-step verification is a feature you can use to keep your Apple ID as secure as possible, Apple said.

“After you turn [Two-step verification] on, there will be no way for anyone to access and manage your account at My Apple ID other than by using your password, verification codes sent your trusted devices, or your Recovery Key,” a note from Apple explained.

To setup two-step verification, users need to register one or more “trusted” devices, a device that can receive a 4-digit verification code through either Find My iPhone notifications or SMS.

Once signed in using an Apple ID through My Apple ID, or through iTunes, the App Store, or iBookstore, users need to enter their password and a 4-digit verification code as shown in the diagram below.

Apple Makes Two Factor Authentication Available for Apple IDs

Apple Makes Two Factor Authentication Available for Apple IDs

 

Apple also provides a 14-digit Recovery Key they can be used to regain access to an account if a trusted device is lost or password is forgotten.

If you use your Apple ID for anything more than simply making purchase via iTunes, you’d be crazy not to take advantage of this added security measure. While it has been available for years, any Gmail users not yet using it, should be taking advantage of Google’s two-step verification security option as well. 

More information on Apple’s two-step verification is available here.

Direct Link:  http://www.securityweek.com/apple-makes-two-factor-authentication-available-apple-ids

Mar 312013
 

Android Trojan Used in APT Attacks

New Attacks Targeting Tibetan and Uyghur Activists Found Using Android Trojan


Security Week

by Mike Lennon
March 26, 2013

 

Targeted attacks against Tibetan and Uyghur activists are nothing new, but attackers appear to be expanding their arsenal of attack tools to the Android platform.

While attacks against the activists in the past have targeted both Windows and Mac OS X-based platforms, researchers from Kaspersky Lab have discovered an APT that successfully leverages Android to compromise targets. 

According to Kaspersky researchers, a high ­profile Tibetan activist had his email account hacked on March 24th, 2013.

Attackers then used the hacked account to send spear phishing e­mails to the victim’s contact list that included a malicious Android Package (APK) attachment named “WUC’s Conference.apk”.

New Attacks Targeting Tibetan and Uyghur Activists Found Using Android Trojan

New Attacks Targeting Tibetan and Uyghur Activists Found Using Android Trojan

 

 

As seen above, the theme of the attack email was a human rights conference event in Geneva, something Kaspersky says has been used in previous attacks targeting Windows users.

Once the Android package is successfully installed, an application called ‘Conference’ shows up on the Android desktop as depicted in the screenshot to the right.

 

Android Trojan Used in APT Attacks

Android Trojan Used in APT Attacks

If the victim launches the malicious app, text about the upcoming event is displayed, appearing to be written by “Dolkun lsa
Chairman of the Executive Committee Word Uyghur Congress”. Note that the attackers incorrectly used “Word” instead of “World” in the text.

As the victim reads the fake message, the malware silently contacts a C&C server located in Los Angeles, California and then starts to harvest data stored on the device.

The stolen data includes contacts, call logs. SMS messages, geo­location and other phone data such as phone number, OS version, phone model, and SDK version, Kaspersky said.

Oddly, the researchers found that the stolen data isn’t sent to the C&C server automatically by the malware, but instead waits for incoming SMS messages that contain one of the following commands: “sms”, “contact”, “location”, “other”. If any of these commands is found, the malware proceeds to encode the stolen data with Base64 and sends it off to the command and control server.

Throughout the code, Kaspersky said, attackers log important actions, likely for debugging purposes, indicating the malware may be an early prototype version.

Kaspersky researchers also discovered a domain that points to the same C&C server IP address: “DlmDocumentsExchange(dot)com”, which was was registered on March 8th, 2013 to “peng jia”, using the email address bdoufwke123010(at)gmail.com.

Also of interest, is that researchers found that the C&C server is hosting an index page that serves up an APK file named “Document.apk”, which has the same functionality as the one Conference.apk but uses text in Chinese, about relations between China, Japan and the disputed “Senkaku Islands / Diaoyudao Islands / Diaoyutai Islands”.

The command ­and­ control server is running Windows Server 2003 and is configured using the Chinese language, indicating that the attackers are likely Chinese speaking.

“Every day, there are hundreds if not thousands of targeted attacks against Tibetan and Uyghur supporters,” the researchers noted. “The vast majority of these target Windows machines through Word documents exploiting known vulnerabilities such as CVE­2012­0158, CVE­2010­3333 and CVE­2009­3129.”

“Until now, we haven’t seen targeted attacks against mobile phones, although we’ve seen indications that these were in development,” the blog post explained.

“[The attack] is perhaps the first in a new wave of targeted attacks aimed at Android users,” the post continued. “So far, the attackers relied entirely on social engineering to infect the targets. History has shown us that, in time, these attacks will use zero-day vulnerabilities, exploits or a combination of techniques.”

Kaspersky detects the Android malware used in the attack as “Backdoor.AndroidOS.Chuli.a” with an MD5 of 0b8806b38b52bebfe39ff585639e2ea2.

Additional technical details on the malware and the attacks can be found here.

Direct Link:  http://www.securityweek.com/android-trojan-used-apt-attacks

Feb 262013
 
PHISHING

PHISHING

Yes Virginia… It is getting worse out there!

I know, I know…. Washington D.C. keeps saying that “Everything Is Getting Better!” But, I wish Washington and our so called Leaders would tell that to the “Scumbag Trolls” on the internet that it is okay to stop ripping people off because the gravy train is back! Until then, you should BE AWARE that there are new phishing scams in the works that will not only put you, your family, your friends, co-workers financially at risk… But also cost you more money on your cellular bill in the way of unwanted text messages.

Very soon, if not already, you will begin getting text messages from somebody you don’t know telling you something like…

“Hey its Jennifer, and I just took some new pictures and wanted to know what you think”

Well, if you decide to look, YOU’RE AN IDIOT!

This is another popular one that goes like this….

“OMG, I can’t believe you let them get a picture of you like that. Check it out (with a link)”

Well, I you decide to look, YOU’RE AN EVEN BIGGER IDIOT!

Or how about these two texts…

From: 8008274203@vtext.com
Message: Call 8 0 0 8 5 1 7 2 6 8 Attention Required California C U

&

From: 2222817829@vtext.com
Message: Attention Required 802 851 7268 California CU

The point in a nutshell is that you should not click or call anything remotely like this nor should you trust the message because it came from what you believe to be a loved / trusted one because it could be they clicked or the information was “SPOOFED” to look legitimate.

We have been posting article on this time of “PHISHING” Schemes, Malware, Trojans, Viruses, etc for awhile now to keep you in the know and as safe as you can be, based on your own caution and habits online.

Surf Safe… Be Safe!

From Your Friends at:

G.E. Investigations, LLC

Toll Free: 866.347.7948

Website: www.GeInvestigations.com

Follow Us / Like Us for more updates and Postings to keep you aware!

** Twitter: http://www.Twitter.com/GeInvestigation

** Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Phoenix-AZ/GE-Investigations-LLC/125237851985

Feb 012013
 

Mobile Attacks Top the List of 2013 Security Threats

Computer World
by: Thor Olavsrad
January 9, 2013

Mobile Attacks Top the List of 2013 Security Threats

Mobile Attacks Top the List of 2013 Security Threats

CIO – Last year, the tech world saw a large number of high-profile attacks and data breaches, and security experts say threats will evolve and escalate in the coming year. BYOD, cloud and advanced persistent threats (APTs) remain top of mind for many, and experts agree that those threats will continue to play a significant role in the threat landscape in 2013. But will this finally be the year that mobile malware leaves its mark? What other new threats lay on the horizon?


Mobile Threats

For years, security experts have predicted the rise of mobile malware, and this year is no exception. Many experts expect mobile threats to escalate in 2013.

“We will see the first major malware on a mobile platform,” Seth Goldhammer, director of product management at LogRhythm, provider of a security information and event management (SIEM) IT platform. “There has already been malware that has made it into the Android Play Store and even Apple’s App Store. Given that the large majority of mobile devices run without any type of malware detection, it is inevitable that we are prone for a major, disruptive malware possibly posing as an update for a popular application.”

“The BYOD phenomenon–that tablets and smart phones outpace laptops in sales–means it is very likely these devices are participating on corporate networks even though IT may have put up safety guards to prevent their use,” Goldhammer adds.

“For enterprises, this means that IT needs greater visibility into how these devices are interacting with the environment and the specific behavior of these devices to recognize when communications alter,” Goldhammer says. “A significant deviation in communication patterns may reflect malware spread. If these devices are participating inside the corporate network, this could prove to be very disruptive, not only due to the increase in network activity but malware moving from mobile to standard operating systems.”

The popular Android mobile operating system, with its open ecosystem, may prove an especially attractive target to cybercriminals. Trend Micro predicts that the number of malicious and high-risk Android apps will increase three-fold from about 350,000 in 2012 to more than 1 million in 2013, broadly in line with the predicted growth of the OS itself.

“In terms of market share, Android may be on its way to dominating the mobile space the same way that Windows dominated the desktop/laptop arena,” Trend Micro notes in its Security Threats to Business, the Digital Lifestyle and the Cloud: Trend Micro Predictions for 2013 and Beyond report. “Malicious and high-risk Android apps are becoming more sophisticated. An “arms race” between Android attackers and security providers is likely to occur in the coming year, much as one occurred a decade or more ago over Microsoft Windows.”

One particular area of concern is malware that buys apps from an app store without user permission. McAfee points to the Android/Marketpay.A Trojan, which already exists, and predicts we’ll see criminals add it as a payload to a mobile worm in 2013.

“Buying apps developed by malware authors puts money in their pockets,” McAfee Labs suggests in its 2013 Threats Predictions report. “A mobile worm that uses exploits to propagate over numerous vulnerable phones is the perfect platform for malware that buys such apps; attackers will no longer need victims to install a piece of malware. If user interaction isn’t needed, there will be nothing to prevent a mobile worm from going on a shopping spree.”

McAfee also has concerns about the near-field communications (NFC) capabilities that are appearing on an increasing number of mobile devices.

“As users are able to make “tap and pay” purchases in more locations, they’ll carry their digital wallets everywhere,” McAfee Labs says. “That flexibility will, unfortunately, also be a boon to thieves. Attackers will create mobile worms with NFC capabilities to propagate (via the “bump and infect” method) and to steal money. Malware writers will thrive in areas with dense populations (airports, malls, theme parks, etc.). An NFC-enabled worm could run rampant through a large crowd, infecting victims and potentially stealing from their wallet accounts.”

McAfee also reports that malware that blocks mobile devices from receiving security updates is likely to appear in 2013.

Mobile Ransomware

Ransomware-in which criminals hijack a user’s capability to access data, communicate or use the system at all and then forces the user to pay a ransom to regain access-spiked in 2012 and is likely to keep growing in 2013, says McAfee.

“Ransomware on Windows PCs has more than tripled during the past year,” McAfee Labs reports. “Attackers have proven that this ‘business model’ works and are scaling up their attacks to increase profits.”

McAfee Labs says it expects to see both Android and Apple’s OS X as targets of ransomware in 2013 as ransomware kits, similar to the malware kits currently available in the underground market, proliferate.

“One limitation for many malware authors seeking profit from mobile devices is that more users transact business on desktop PCs than on tablets or phones,” McAfee Labs says. “But this trend may not last; the convenience of portable browsers will likely lead more people to do their business on the go. Attackers have already developed ransomware for mobile devices. What if the ransom demand included threats to distribute recorded calls and pictures taken with the phone? We anticipate considerably more activity in this area during 2013.”

AlienVault, provider of a unified security management solution, agrees, “We will see new ransomware tactics in 2013 as a result of the poor economy and the success of this type of attack (reportedly, cybercriminals raked in $5 million using ransomware tactics in 2012).”

Windows Still a Target

On the Windows front, Trend Micro reports that Windows 8 will offer consumers key security improvements-especially the Secure Boot and Early Launch Anti-Malware (ELAM) features—. However, enterprises are unlikely to see these benefits in the coming year. Analysts from research firm Gartner believe most enterprises won’t begin to roll out Windows 8 in large numbers until 2014 at the earliest.

McAfee suggests that attackers targeting Windows of all varieties will expand their use of sophisticated and devastating below-the-kernel attacks.

“The evolution of computer security software and other defenses on client endpoints is driving threats into different areas of the operating system stack, especially for covert and persistent attackers,” McAfee Labs says.

“The frequency of threats attacking Microsoft Windows below the kernel are increasing. Some of the critical assets targeted include the BIOS, master boot record (MBR), volume boot record (VBR), GUID Partition Table (GPT) and NTLoader,” McAfee Labs says. “Although the volume of these threats is unlikely to approach that of simpler attacks on Windows and applications, the impact of these complex attacks can be far more devastating. We expect to see more threats in this area during 2013.”

HTML5 Creates a Greater Attack Surface

This year will see continuing adoption of HTML5. McAfee notes that it provides language improvements, capabilities to remove the need for plug-ins, new layout rendering options and powerful APIs that support local data storage, device access, 2D/3D rendering, web-socket communication and more. While HTML5 offers a number of security improvements-McAfee believes there will be a reduction in exploits focused on plug-ins as browsers provide that functionality through their new media capabilities and APIs-it also suggests the additional functionality will create a larger attack surface.

“One of the primary separations between a native application and an HTML application has been the ability of the former to perform arbitrary network connections on the client,” McAfee Labs says. “HTML5 increases the attack surface for every user, as its features do not require extensive policy or access controls. Thus they allow a page served from the Internet to exploit WebSocket functionality and poke around the user’s local network.”

“In the past,” McAfee reports, “this opportunity for attackers was limited because any malicious use was thwarted by the same-origin policy, which has been a cornerstone of security in HTML-based products. With HTML5, however, Cross Origin Resource Sharing will let scripts from one domain make network requests, post data, and access data from the target domain, thereby allowing HTML pages to perform reconnaissance and limited operations on the user’s network.”

Destructive Attacks

Experts also expect a rise in destructive attacks in 2013 by hacktivists and state actors.

“In 2013, we will see further destructive attacks (cybersabotage and cyberweaponry) on utilities and critical infrastructure systems,” says Harry Sverdlove, CTO of security firm Bit9. “We saw Shamoon wipe out the systems of a major oil company in the Middle East, and that company’s cybersecurity was no more lax than comparable companies in the United States or Europe. We know the bad guys have the ability to disrupt these systems, all they need is motive.”

LogRythm’s Goldhammer agrees: “We should also expect to see an increase in nation state attacks and hacktivism. It might be hard for some people to believe that we’ll see an increase in 2013 after so many well-documented and publicized attacks, but I expect we’ll see hacktivists take much more aggressive measures.”

While earlier attacks may have just embarrassed a country or company via website defacement or exposing their databases publicly, Goldhammer says he expects that to change: “I can see splinter cells of hackers take more aggressive means to cripple networks or corrupt data, or use ransom tactics, in order to financially punish or tactically weaken. In 2012, more and more evidence shows nation states using malware or using exploits to gain information or to attack infrastructure. In 2013, I expect to see headlines talking about a growing number of nation states building exploits against each other, both for data retrieval, data corruption and damage to infrastructure.”

McAfee and Trend Micro both concur.

“Destructive payloads in malware have become rare because attackers prefer to take control of their victims’ computers for financial gain or to steal intellectual property,” McAfee Labs says. “Recently, however, we have seen several attacks-some apparently targeted, others implemented as worms-in which the only goal was to cause as much damage as possible. We expect this malicious behavior to grow in 2013.”

“Whether this is hacktivism taken to a new level, as some claim, or just malicious intent is impossible to say, but the worrying fact is that companies appear to be rather vulnerable to such attacks,” McAfee adds. “As with distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, the technical bar for the hackers to hurdle is rather low. If attackers can install destructive malware on a large number of machines, then the result can be devastating.”

Direct Link:  http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9235504/Mobile_Attacks_Top_the_List_of_2013_Security_Threats?taxonomyId=82

 

 

 

Oct 032012
 

White House says it thwarted cyberattack

U.S. News & World Report
by Jim Kuhnhenn / AP
October 1, 2012

 

 

WASHINGTON (AP) —

The White House is acknowledging an attempt to infiltrate its computer system, but says it thwarted the effort and that no classified networks were threatened.

White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters the White House is equipped with mitigation measures that identified the attack, isolated it and prevented its spread.

He said there was no indication that any data was removed.

“There are distinctions between those networks that contain classified information and those that don’t, and the attack was against an unclassified network,” Carney said.

Carney described the attack as “spear-phishing” and said such efforts against government computer systems are “not infrequent.” Carney spoke in Henderson, Nev., where President Barack Obama is preparing for his first debate against rival Mitt Romney on Wednesday.

“Phishing” is a tactic that involves sending an email that falsely claims to be from a legitimate enterprise in an attempt to trick the user into turning over information.

Last year, Google Inc. blamed computer hackers in China for a phishing effort against Gmail accounts of several hundred people, including senior U.S. government officials and military personnel. Last November, senior U.S. intelligence officials for the first time publicly accused China of systematically stealing American high-tech data for its own national economic gain.

The White House would not say whether the recent attack was linked to China.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, during a visit to China last month, raised the subject of China-based cyberattacks against American companies and the government.

News of the most recent attack came as the Obama administration is preparing an executive order with new rules to protect U.S. computer systems. After Congress failed this summer to pass a comprehensive cybersecurity bill, the White House said it would use executive branch authorities to improve the nation’s computer security, especially for networks tied to essential U.S. industries, such as electric grids, water plants, and banks.

An initial draft of the order included provisions for voluntary cybersecurity standards for companies, a special council run by the Homeland Security Department and a review to determine if existing cybersecurity regulations are adequate.

But by issuing the executive order just weeks before the election, the White House risks complaints that President Barack Obama is anti-business from Republicans and the same pro-business groups that killed the legislation on Capitol Hill. They opposed a Senate bill that they said could lead to costly rules and regulations that would burden companies without reducing the risks.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, one of only a few Republicans to support the Senate bill, said Monday that an executive order is a “big mistake” because it can’t grant incentives, such as liability protection, to encourage businesses to share information with government agencies about cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities.

Executive orders are legally binding, but can be reversed by subsequent administrations, and they don’t reflect a consensus as legislation passed by Congress does, Collins said at a cybersecurity event sponsored by The Wilson Center.

“I fear that it could actually lull people into a false sense of security — that we’ve taken care of cybersecurity,” she said. “And the executive order simply cannot do that.”

__

Associated Press writer Richard Lardner contributed to this article.

 

Direct Link:  http://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2012/10/01/white-house-says-it-thwarted-cyberattack