Feb 292012
 

Fighting L.A.’s gangs with families

 

Officials say L.A. Deputy Mayor Guillermo Cespedes’ effort, known as the Gang Reduction and Youth Development program, is working.

Los Angeles Times
Opinion / Editorial
By Jim Newton
February 27, 2012
Guillermo Cespedes

 

Guillermo Cespedes speaks to the media after his appointment. (Los Angeles Times / September 8, 2009)

In a large conference room at City Hall East, more than 100 gang-intervention workers gathered last week to hear about a new approach to heading off gang violence and the destruction it causes. They had come to hear a family tell its story.

The mother did most of the talking, guided by a counselor. She was there with two of her children, a son and a daughter, and they’d been through the wringer. An older daughter had gotten in trouble, deeper and deeper. She’d neglected her schoolwork and fought back when her parents tried to discipline her. She ran away from home, got pregnant. “The road she was on,” the mother said, “was not good.”

As the mother and father became increasingly preoccupied with trying to set their older daughter straight, they had less time to spend with their younger children, and soon those two began to show signs of trouble as well. Their grades dropped; the boy’s interest in sports flagged.

Gripped by the sense that they were losing control, the parents called for help. It came in the form of a local organization, whose counselor dove into the life of this young family, escorting the kids to school, arranging for tutors, counseling the parents. Slowly, life settled down. The son got glasses, started doing his homework and brought up his grades; the younger daughter joined a program for future executives and thrived.

Asked to explain what got his attention and turned him around, the boy responded, “Jesus,” then quickly added, “and the ladies.”

The counselor for this session was Harry Aponte, a nationally recognized gang-intervention expert from Philadelphia, and he patiently waded through the family history as the audience of intervention workers listened, many taking notes.

This family-centered approach represents a new tack in Los Angeles’ long quest to divert young people from gangs. The philosophy behind it is that focusing on a single troubled child isn’t enough. Schools and neighborhoods surround children, but their families are their core of support and thus the most natural people to help them.

“We’re shifting the focus from the individual to the family,” Deputy Mayor Guillermo Cespedes explained. “Every family has a problem-solving mechanism that gets jammed. We’re trying to address that.”

Police and others credit Cespedes’ efforts, known as the Gang Reduction and Youth Development program, with making steady progress against gang violence in Los Angeles. Last year, crime overall in the city continued its long decline (though homicides ticked back up by a single killing, from 297 to 298), and the drop in gang crime continued to outpace that for crime generally. Fewer gang members fired shots or were themselves shot, and gang crimes overall fell by more than 15%, from 5,537 to 4,694. (Again, homicides were an exception, though a relatively small one: 170 killings in 2011 were attributed to gang violence, up from 161 the year before.)

So impressed is Police Chief Charlie Beck with the program’s contribution to reducing gang crime in Los Angeles that, in an interview with Times reporters and editors last week, he said he’s judging the field of mayoral candidates in part by which ones would keep the office structured as part of the mayor’s staff. That configuration is useful, Beck explained, because gang crime is not spread evenly throughout the city, and giving the council oversight of the efforts means that there are pressures to spread its resources across 15 districts, rather than concentrate them where they are needed. “If [the program] becomes a council department again,” he said, “it’s not going to have the focus it has now.”

Meanwhile, the approach is continuing to evolve. Driven by the program’s determination to fuse research and real-world experience, Cespedes says he and others have concluded that families need to be at the center of the program’s efforts. Hence the training last week at City Hall.

During his 90 minutes with the family, Aponte listened carefully as the mother and her children spelled out the elements of their success as well as the challenges that lie ahead. The older daughter has just had her baby and is living in a group home. The younger children still have a long way to go in school, and the temptation of gangs will not recede with just one strong report card.

But Aponte also recognized the family’s progress, its emergence from a long stretch of tough work. “You’re celebrating life,” he observed. “You’ve gone through a dark alley, and now you’re celebrating.”

The mother nodded, as did her children. Aponte turned to his audience to emphasize the point: “They will not lose this…. This is their trophy to take home.”

 

 

 

 

 

Direct Link:  http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-newton-column-gang-intervention-20120227,0,3021365.column

Jan 012012
 

Police seek information in two gang-related shootings

Los Angeles Times
By: Angel Jennings
December 29, 2011

 

 

 

 

Police are looking for information that can help identify two suspects involved in a pair of gang-related shootings this week.

The first incident took place at 9:45 a.m. Wednesday in South L.A. on 53rd Street just west of Normandie Avenue, according to a police report.  A late ’90s brown Buick drove past a 17-year-old boy who was standing on the street. The driver stopped and someone exited from the back seat. The suspect put a handgun to the back of the victim’s head. The victim moved slightly and the suspect fired one shot, causing the round to enter the back of the victim’s neck. The suspect fled in the Buick heading westbound on 53rd Street.

The victim is in critical condition.

The armed suspect was wearing a dark gray or black sweatshirt with white lettering and black pants.

The second shooting occurred at 12:40 p.m. in the 6000 block of South Vermont Avenue, just 1.5 miles away from the first incident.  A 14-year-old boy was also shot at close range in front of Bottoms Up Liquor.  A woman approached the boy and fired several rounds, striking him in the back and face. The suspect ran northbound to a four-door white Honda and fled eastbound on 64th Street.

The boy is in critical condition.

Witnesses described the female suspect as in her 20s, wearing a multicolored shirt with horizontal pink stripes.

People with any information are asked to call Det. Villalobos or Det. Mendoza of the 77th area gang investigation team at (323) 789-4845.

 

Direct Link:  http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/12/police-seek-information-in-two-gang-related-shootings.html

Jan 012012
 

L.A.’s triumph over crime

More officers and better policing are among the key reasons L.A. is a much safer city today.

The graduation ceremony recruit officer class of October 2009.Across the nation, the homicide rate — the number of people killed per 100,000 population — increased from about four per 100,000 in the 1950s to about 10 in the early 1990s; since then, it has dropped to about 5.5. The decline in Los Angeles has been far greater: In 1993, the homicide rate was 30.5 per 100,000; this year, it’s on track to end at about six. (Los Angeles Times)

November 26, 2011

As families gather across Los Angeles and beyond, many will celebrate the holiday weekend with a joy they owe in part to this city’s historic triumph against crime. In the early 1990s, Los Angeles typically was the scene of more than 1,000 murders a year, a shocking toll that sapped the city’s self-confidence as it cut a devastating swath through neighborhoods, schools and, most tragically, families. It has become easy in recent years to expect crime to decline here, but it’s worth remembering how dangerous this city was compared with how safe it is.

As of mid-November this year, 254 men and women have been murdered in Los Angeles during 2011. That’s still a shocking number, but it means that some 800 families will enjoy this holiday without the shadow of murder. And that’s true year after year; those 800 families are merely those who escaped a tragedy in the last 12 months. Hundreds more would have suffered a loss in the previous year or years before, so the relief is as compounding as the tragedy once was.

That sea change in violence and its ramifications is part of a national trend, though the effects in Los Angeles have been particularly dramatic. Across the nation, the homicide rate — the number of people killed per 100,000 population — increased from about four per 100,000 in the 1950s to about 10 in the early 1990s; since then, it has dropped to about 5.5. The decline in Los Angeles has been far greater: In 1993, the homicide rate was 30.5 per 100,000; this year, it’s on track to end at about six. As city leaders like to note, not since Eisenhower was president has Los Angeles been this safe.

The reasons for this change have been widely studied, though not to a complete consensus. Social scientists have pointed to changing demographics — the aging of a youthful population that accounts for most violent crime — the waning popularity of crack, rising prison populations, gun control laws, even the legalization of abortion. The theory regarding abortion argues that unwanted children are disproportionately inclined to commit crimes, so limiting the number of such children also has had the effect of reducing crime. One provocative statistic: The decline in crime in high-propensity abortion states from 1985 to 1997 was 25.9%, while in low-propensity abortion states over the same period, crime increased 4.1%.

But two factors have commanded the most attention: the increased number of police officers, again nationally as well as in Los Angeles, and the adoption of new policing strategies, usually under the general definition of “community policing.” Both have been at work in Los Angeles for most of that period, and offer a persuasive rebuttal to social scientists who once doubted whether police had much to do with crime. Driven by improved statistical analysis and refined responses to crime trends — as well as renewed commitment to respect for constitutional rights — police are registering significant gains in systematically combating crime. Long and gratefully past are the days when chiefs such as Los Angeles’ Daryl F. Gates could argue that smaller, aggressive forces were in the public interest. Gates’ approach led to increased crime and public revulsion at police practices; the opposite has bolstered confidence in police and driven down crime. The impact of modern policing, both in numbers and in approach, is validated by the work of the LAPD in recent decades, as it is in New York and elsewhere. Today, few criminologists argue that police are irrelevant.

There is, in addition, a growing body of literature on the effects of this historic decline in crime, especially murder. For every crime there is a cost — property that is lost, medical bills to pay, work days missed and the more difficult-to-measure effects of psychological damage to survivors. One study by researchers at Iowa State University in 2010 concluded that the societal cost of a single murder — including the cost to victims, to the criminal justice system and to the lost productivity of offenders, as well as a complicated measure known as the “willingness to pay” to prevent murder — exceeds $17 million. By that calculation, the savings to Los Angeles of eliminating 800 murders a year since the early 1990s comes to more than $1.36 billion annually. As those researchers noted “In addition to the lives that are lost and shattered, murder also denotes extraordinary collateral fiscal costs.”

No family that has lost a relative to murder ever entirely recovers. The empty seat at Thanksgiving may be occupied, but the hole left by an absent son or daughter, a missing mother or father, never again is filled to the brim. This weekend in Los Angeles, 800 families enjoy a holiday that would have been barren by comparison had they lost a loved one this year to a murder. That is a social victory for which every resident of this city should be appreciative.