NDAA : National Defense Authorization Act

**UPDATE**  NDAA Conference Report and Highlights  Now Available **

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is comprehensive legislation which authorizes the budget authority of the Department of Defense and the national security programs of the Department of Energy.

The legislation is composed of the Full Committee Mark and the marks of the committee’s six subcommittees with legislative jurisdiction. 

Until the final version approved by a 60-1 vote by the Armed Services Committee is filed on the House Floor, please reference the subcommittee marks, Full Committee Mark, and all the amendments posted on the Full Committee Mark page as the official version of the legislation.

This will continue to be the online home for all resources related to the NDAA including Markup Schedule, the Legislative Action blog and Press Releases.

 

Direct Link:   http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/ndaa-home?p=ndaa

 

Charges: Navy veteran injected teen with heroin

 The Associated Press
By Rachel D’Oro
Tuesday Dec 27, 2011

ANCHORAGE, Alaska —

A 14-year-old Alaska girl is in critical condition days after a 26-year-old man injected her with heroin at his Anchorage home, authorities said Tuesday.

Sean Warner is charged with a drug-related felony and other counts. Court documents say Warner tried to revive the girl himself and didn’t immediately call police.

“Her condition is dire,” assistant District Attorney Regan Williams said Tuesday, adding the girl was on an artificial respirator. “The real sadness is that there’s not that much brain activity.”

The girl continued to be treated Tuesday at an Anchorage hospital, where she was taken Dec. 23 with a drug overdose, police said. Charging documents say the girl, identified only as J.D., was found to have heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine in her system. Medics told authorities the girl had sustained damage to her brain and heart.

Warner’s bail has been set at $90,000. A booking official said Warner remained in custody.

KTUU reports that Warner’s father and a friend dispute the allegations and they say Warner is a Navy veteran who saved lives as a medic in Afghanistan. The two said Warner had struggled since returning from the war.

Warner is being represented by the Public Defender Agency, but it was unclear if he has been assigned to a specific attorney yet.

According to the court papers, two others went with Warner to pick the girl up Thursday night and take her back to Warner’s home to hang out. Williams said both of the witnesses are men.

Warner was sharing a gram of heroin with the men, and the girl said she was willing to try something “new,” but didn’t want to inject herself, according to the documents. Warner tried to inject the girl, but failed, so he had her lie down on his bed and hold out an arm, then used his belt as a tourniquet and shot 25 to- 30 units of heroin, taking several times to find a vein, the papers say.

The two witnesses told authorities they left the girl on the bed and found her the next morning, face down in her vomit, according to the papers.

“They felt for her purse, sat her up, and grew concerned at her condition and upset at WARNER’s ambivalence,” the documents state.

Warner did not want to call 911 because he didn’t want authorities to find drugs, so instead he placed a tablet of Suboxone — a prescription drug that’s used to treat opiate addiction — under the unconscious girl’s tongue, according to the court papers. A couple hours later, the girl began convulsing and Warner called 911, the papers say.

The girl was rushed to Providence Alaska Medical Center.

Responding officers did not find drugs because Warner had locked his bedroom door and told police it belonged to a roommate, the court documents state. After police left, Warner and one of the witnesses put needles and other “related evidence” into a box then dumped it behind a trash bin at a nearby business, according to the papers, which say police later recovered paraphernalia including syringes.

Warner is charged with delivering a controlled substance to a minor who is at least three years younger than the accused, contributing to the delinquency of a minor and evidence tampering. He also is charged with theft, accused of stealing a $900 surveillance system from Costco on the same day he took the girl to his home, according to the documents.

 

Direct Link:  http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2011/12/ap-navy-veteran-charged-injected-teen-heroin-122711/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

 

 

Peoria police: New database helps investigators catch metal thieves

ABC15 News

By: Tim Vetscher

December 27, 2011

 

 

PEORIA, AZ –

A new law hopes to combat the theft of copper and other metals in Arizona.

When Mark Browitt buys scrap metal from someone, the state requires he fill out a whole host of paperwork complete with a copy of the seller’s driver license and a description of what they sold.

Come New Year’s Day, however, Browitt will begin submitting that information online.

“Everything is expedited a lot faster electronically to the metal thefts center where they process it,” said Browitt, General Manager of Davis Salvage Co. near 34th Street and Washington.

The LeadsOnline website collects the information from scrap yards which police can then use to cross reference with metal thefts in their jurisdiction in search of potential criminals.

Legally scrap yards aren’t required to use the new online system until January 1st, 2012 but some have already started and that’s already paying dividends for Valley police departments.

Investigators working a string of back flow valve thefts in Peoria scoured the website to see who, if anyone, had sold such a valve.

They claim the database returned the names of 25-year-old Douglas Tongen and 20-year-old Mark Villagomez.

Investigators said they started following the two and eventually caught them stealing metal.

“As this case illustrates, this particular vendor was ahead of his mandatory obligation and making the entries,” said Jay Davies with the Peoria Police Department.  “The partnerships with these vendors are going  to be critical.”

Browitt, for one, says he’ll do his part.

“People are stealing materials, so they need something to counteract that,” said Browitt.

He, and others, hopes the new system will put a dent in Arizona’s metal theft problem.

 

Direct Link:  http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/region_west_valley/peoria/peoria-police-new-database-helps-investigators-catch-metal-thieves

 

 
Go Daddy No Longer Supports SOPA
Looks to Internet Community & Fellow Tech Leaders to Develop Legislation We All Support
GoDaddy.com PR Specialist
Stephanie Bracken
480.505.8800 ext.4451

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. (Dec. 23, 2011) – Go Daddy is no longer supporting SOPA, the “Stop Online Piracy Act” currently working its way through U.S. Congress.

“Fighting online piracy is of the utmost importance, which is why Go Daddy has been working to help craft revisions to this legislation – but we can clearly do better,” Warren Adelman, Go Daddy’s newly appointed CEO, said. “It’s very important that all Internet stakeholders work together on this. Getting it right is worth the wait. Go Daddy will support it when and if the Internet community supports it.”

Go Daddy and its General Counsel, Christine Jones, have worked with federal lawmakers for months to help craft revisions to legislation first introduced some three years ago. Jones has fought to express the concerns of the entire Internet community and to improve the bill by proposing changes to key defined terms, limitations on DNS filtering to ensure the integrity of the Internet, more significant consequences for frivolous claims, and specific provisions to protect free speech.

“As a company that is all about innovation, with our own technology and in support of our customers, Go Daddy is rooted in the idea of First Amendment Rights and believes 100 percent that the Internet is a key engine for our new economy,” said Adelman.

In changing its position, Go Daddy remains steadfast in its promise to support security and stability of the Internet. In an effort to eliminate any confusion about its reversal on SOPA though, Jones has removed blog postings that had outlined areas of the bill Go Daddy did support.

“Go Daddy has always fought to preserve the intellectual property rights of third parties, and will continue to do so in the future,” Jones said.

 

About Go Daddy

Go Daddy is a leading provider of services that enable individuals and businesses to establish, maintain and evolve an online presence. Go Daddy provides a variety of domain name registration plans, as well as website design and hosting packages. Go Daddy has a broad array of cloud-based products and services. These include products such as SSL Certificates, Domains by Proxy private registration, ecommerce website hosting, blog software, search engine optimization utilities, email marketing tools, website design services, website security software and online storage solutions. Go Daddy has more than 51 million domain names under management. Go Daddy registers, renews or transfers more than one domain name every second of every day. GoDaddy.com is the largest worldwide mass-market hosting provider by annual revenue according to Tier1 Research (Mass-Market Hosting Report-Winter 2011) and is the world’s No. 1 domain name registrar according to Name Intelligence, Inc. Go Daddy registered more than one-third of all new domain names created in 2010 for in the top six generic top-level domains, or gTLDs, including .com, .net, .org, .info, .biz and .mobi.

Get up close and personal with CEO and Founder Bob Parsons and receive great advice for life and business along the way! Visit www.BobParsons.me.

- The Go Daddy Group -

 

 

Guns in Public, and Out of Sight

The New York Times

By
December 26, 2011

 

Alan Simons and his family were riding their bikes in Asheville, N.C., when a driver, Charles Diez, pulled up next to him and started berating him. Mr. Diez, who had a permit for a concealed weapon, fired at Mr. Simons. The bullet passed through his helmet.

 

Alan Simons was enjoying a Sunday morning bicycle ride with his family in Asheville, N.C., two years ago when a man in a sport utility vehicle suddenly pulled alongside him and started berating him for riding on the highway.

Ashville Police Department

The bullet passed through Mr. Simons’s helmet.

Mr. Simons, his 4-year-old son strapped in behind him, slowed to a halt. The driver, Charles Diez, an Asheville firefighter, stopped as well. When Mr. Simons walked over, he found himself staring down the barrel of a gun.

“Go ahead, I’ll shoot you,” Mr. Diez said, according to Mr. Simons. “I’ll kill you.”

Mr. Simons turned to leave but heard a deafening bang. A bullet had passed through his bike helmet just above his left ear, barely missing him.

Mr. Diez, as it turned out, was one of more than 240,000 people in North Carolina with a permit to carry a concealed handgun. If not for that gun, Mr. Simons is convinced, the confrontation would have ended harmlessly. “I bet it would have been a bunch of mouthing,” he said.

Mr. Diez, then 42, eventually pleaded guilty to assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill.

Across the country, it is easier than ever to carry a handgun in public. Prodded by the gun lobby, most states, including North Carolina, now require only a basic background check, and perhaps a safety class, to obtain a permit.

In state after state, guns are being allowed in places once off-limits, like bars, college campuses and houses of worship. And gun rights advocates are seeking to expand the map still further, pushing federal legislation that would require states to honor other states’ concealed weapons permits. The House approved the bill last month; the Senate is expected to take it up next year.

The bedrock argument for this movement is that permit holders are law-abiding citizens who should be able to carry guns in public to protect themselves. “These are people who have proven themselves to be among the most responsible and safe members of our community,” the federal legislation’s author, Representative Cliff Stearns, Republican of Florida, said on the House floor.

To assess that claim, The New York Times examined the permit program in North Carolina, one of a dwindling number of states where the identities of permit holders remain public. The review, encompassing the last five years, offers a rare, detailed look at how a liberalized concealed weapons law has played out in one state. And while it does not provide answers, it does raise questions.

More than 2,400 permit holders were convicted of felonies or misdemeanors, excluding traffic-related crimes, over the five-year period, The Times found when it compared databases of recent criminal court cases and licensees. While the figure represents a small percentage of those with permits, more than 200 were convicted of felonies, including at least 10 who committed murder or manslaughter. All but two of the killers used a gun.

Among them was Bobby Ray Bordeaux Jr., who had a concealed handgun permit despite a history of alcoholism, major depression and suicide attempts. In 2008, he shot two men with a .22-caliber revolver, killing one of them, during a fight outside a bar.

More than 200 permit holders were also convicted of gun- or weapon-related felonies or misdemeanors, including roughly 60 who committed weapon-related assaults.

In addition, nearly 900 permit holders were convicted of drunken driving, a potentially volatile circumstance given the link between drinking and violence.

The review also raises concerns about how well government officials police the permit process. In about half of the felony convictions, the authorities failed to revoke or suspend the holder’s permit, including for cases of murder, rape and kidnapping. The apparent oversights are especially worrisome in North Carolina, one of about 20 states where anyone with a valid concealed handgun permit can buy firearms without the federally mandated criminal background check. (Under federal law, felons lose the right to own guns.)

Ricky Wills, 59, kept his permit after recently spending several months behind bars for terrorizing his estranged wife and their daughter with a pair of guns and then shooting at their house while they, along with a sheriff’s deputy who had responded to a 911 call, were inside. “That’s crazy, absolutely crazy,” his wife, Debra Wills, said in an interview when told that her husband could most likely still buy a gun at any store in the state.

Mr. Wills’s permit was revoked this month, after The Times informed the local sheriff’s office.

 

Growing National Trend

Gun laws vary across the country, but in most states, people do not need a license to keep firearms at home. Although some states allow guns to be carried in public in plain sight, gun rights advocates have mostly focused their efforts on expanding the right to carry concealed handguns.

 

Ashville Police Department
Charles Diez (Fire Fighter / Shooter)

The national movement toward more expansive concealed handgun laws began in earnest in 1987, when Florida instituted a “shall issue” permit process, in which law enforcement officials are required to grant the permits as long as applicants satisfy certain basic legal requirements.

The authorities in shall-issue states deny permits to certain applicants, like convicted felons and people who have been involuntarily committed to a mental health institution, unless their gun rights have been restored. North Carolina, which enacted its shall-issue law in 1995, also bars applicants who have committed violent misdemeanors and has a variety of other disqualifiers; it also requires enrollment in a gun safety class.

Today, 39 states either have a shall-issue permit process or do not require a permit at all to carry a concealed handgun. Ten others are “may issue,” meaning law enforcement agencies have discretion to conduct more in-depth investigations and exercise their judgment. For example, the authorities might turn down someone who has no criminal record but appears to pose a risk or does not make a convincing case about needing to carry a gun. Gun rights advocates argue, however, that such processes are rife with the potential for abuse.

For now, the permits are good only in the holder’s home state, as well as others that recognize them. The bill under consideration in Congress would require that permits be recognized everywhere, even in jurisdictions that might bar the holder from owning a gun in the first place.

In recent years, a succession of state legislatures have also struck down restrictions on carrying concealed weapons in all sorts of public places. North Carolina this year began allowing concealed handguns in local parks, and next year the legislature is expected to consider permitting guns in restaurants.

Efforts to evaluate the impact of concealed carry laws on crime rates have produced contradictory results.

Researchers acknowledge that those who fit the demographic profile of a typical permit holder — middle-age white men — are not usually major drivers of violent crime. At the same time, several states have produced statistical reports showing, as in North Carolina, that a small segment does end up on the wrong side of the law. As a result, the question becomes whether allowing more people to carry guns actually deters crime, as gun rights advocates contend, and whether that outweighs the risks posed by the minority who commit crimes.

Gun rights advocates invariably point to the work of John R. Lott, an economist who concluded in the late 1990s that the laws had substantially reduced violent crime. Subsequent studies, however, have found serious flaws in his data and methodology.

A few independent researchers using different data have come to similar conclusions, but many other studies have found no net effect of concealed carry laws or have come to the opposite conclusion. Most notably, Ian Ayres and John J. Donohue, economists and law professors, concluded that the best available data and modeling showed that permissive right-to-carry laws, at a minimum, increased aggravated assaults. Their data also showed that robberies and homicides went up, but the findings were not statistically significant.

In the end, most researchers say the scattershot results are not unexpected, because the laws, in all likelihood, have not significantly increased the number of people carrying concealed weapons among those most likely to commit crimes or to be victimized.

 

Crimes by Permit Holders

Gun advocates are quick to cite anecdotes of permit holders who stopped crimes with their guns. It is virtually impossible, however, to track these episodes in a systematic way. By contrast, crimes committed by permit holders can be.

The shooting at the Hogs Pen Pub in Macclesfield, N.C., in August 2008 took place after when two men, Cliff Jackson and Eddie Bordeaux, got into a scuffle outside the bar. John Warlick, who was there with his wife, helped separate them, only to see Eddie’s brother, Bobby Ray, fatally shoot Mr. Jackson in the back of the head. Mr. Bordeaux then shot Mr. Warlick in the upper torso, wounding him.

Bobby Ray Bordeaux had obtained a concealed carry permit in 2004 and used to take a handgun everywhere. He was also an alcoholic and heavy user of marijuana with a long history of depression, according to court records. He had been hospitalized repeatedly for episodes related to his drinking, including about a year before, when he shot himself in the chest with a pistol while drunk in an apparent suicide attempt. Mr. Bordeaux, then 48, started drinking heavily at age 13. He had been taking medication for depression but had not taken it the day of the shooting, he later told the police. He also said he had 15 beers and smoked marijuana that night and claimed to have no memory of what occurred. He was eventually convicted of first-degree murder and assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury.

John K. Gallaher III, a permit holder since 2006, was also an alcoholic with serious mental health issues, said David Hall, the assistant district attorney who prosecuted him for murder. In May 2008, Mr. Gallaher, then 24, shot and killed a friend, Sean Gallagher, and a woman, Lori Fioravanti, with a .25-caliber Beretta after an argument at his grandfather’s home. The police found 22 guns, including an assault rifle, at his home. Mr. Gallaher pleaded guilty to two counts of first-degree murder last year.

Among the other killings: three months after receiving his permit in July 2006, Mark Stephen Thomas killed Christopher Brynarsky with a handgun after an argument at Mr. Brynarsky’s custom detail shop. In 2007, Jamez Mellion, a permit holder since 2004, killed Capt. Paul Burton Miner III of the Army by shooting him 10 times with two handguns after finding him with his estranged wife. William Littleton, who obtained a permit in 1998 and was well known to the police because of complaints about him, shot his neighbor to death with a rifle in 2008 over a legal dispute.

More common were less serious gun-related episodes like these: in July 2008, Scotty L. Durham, who got his permit in 2006, confronted his soon-to-be ex-wife and another man in the parking lot of Coffee World in Durham and fired two shots in the air with a .45-caliber Glock. Antoine Cornelius Whitted, a permit holder since 2009, discharged his semiautomatic handgun during a street fight in Durham last year. Jerry Maurice Thomas, a permit holder since 2009 whose drinking problems were well known to the authorities, held a gun to his girlfriend’s head at his house in Asheville last year, prompting a standoff with the police.

Falling Through the Cracks

Gun rights advocates in North Carolina, as well as elsewhere, often point to the low numbers of permit revocations as evidence of how few permit holders break the law. Yet permits were often not suspended or revoked in North Carolina when they should have been.

Charles Dowdle of Franklin was convicted of multiple felonies in 2006 for threatening to kill his girlfriend and chasing her to her sister’s house, where he fired a shotgun round through a closed door. He then pointed the gun at the sister, who knocked it away, causing it to fire again. Mr. Dowdle was sentenced to probation, but his concealed handgun permit remained active until it expired in 2009.

Mr. Dowdle, 63, said in a telephone interview that although he gave away his guns after his conviction, no one had ever done anything about his permit. He said he “could probably have purchased” a gun with it but had not done so because federal law forbade it.

Besides felons like Mr. Dowdle, The Times also found scores of people who kept their permits after convictions for violent misdemeanors. They included more than half of the roughly 40 permit holders convicted in the last five years of assault by pointing gun and nearly two-thirds of the more than 70 convicted of a common domestic violence charge, assault on a female.

Precisely how these failures of oversight occurred is not clear. The normal protocol would be for the local sheriff’s office to suspend and eventually revoke a permit after a holder is arrested and convicted of a disqualifying crime, the authorities said. The State Bureau of Investigation, which maintains a computerized database of permits, also tries to notify individual sheriffs when it discovers that a holder has been arrested for a serious crime, according to a spokeswoman, but the process is not formalized.

In Ricky Wills’s case, he not only threatened his wife and daughter last May with a handgun and a rifle, but he shot at their house while a Union County sheriff’s deputy was inside. It led to convictions on two charges: assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill and assault on a police officer.

Soon after the shooting, Mr. Wills’s wife obtained a restraining order, which also should have led to his permit being suspended.

Sgt. Lori Pierce, who handles concealed handgun permits in Union County, said no one ever notified her about Mr. Wills, who was released from prison in November. And as the sole person handling permits in her county, she said, she does not have time to conduct regular criminal checks on permit holders, unless they are up for a five-year renewal.

As it is, she said, she can barely keep up with issuing permits. She has granted about 1,300 this year.

Tom Torok contributed reporting.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: December 27, 2011

A previous version of this article misstated the name of the North Carolina town that is home to the Hogs Pen Pub, outside of which Bobby Ray Bordeaux, the holder of a concealed weapon permit, fatally shot Cliff Jackson. It is Macclesfield, not Macclesville.

 

Direct Link:   http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/27/us/more-concealed-guns-and-some-are-in-the-wrong-hands.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha23

 

Tens of thousands customers abandon GoDaddy

KPHO 5 News
Dec 27, 2011 11:44 AM

 

 

PHOENIX (KPHO) –

 

Segment Video

 

Valley-based GoDaddy.com is facing angry backlash from customers today.

About 70,000 people have abandoned the company in the last few days.

Many of the people say they don’t agree with the domain registrar’s decision to support legislation called SOPA, Stop Online Piracy Act. The proposal would make it a crime if people use copyrighted material on their site, and those convicted could face fines.

Originally, Go Daddy said they supported it, however, after many customers pulled their information off Go Daddy’s site, their tune changed.

“Fighting online piracy is of the utmost importance, which is why GoDaddy has been working to help craft revisions to legislation but we can clearly do better. It’s very important that all Internet stakeholders work together on this. Getting it right is worth the wait,” GoDaddy CEO Warren Adelman said.

There is a call for a national boycott starting on Friday.

GoDaddy has about 9 million customers.

 

 

 

Direct Link: http://www.kpho.com/story/16397560/tens-of-thousands-customers-abandon-go-daddy?Call=Email&Format=HTML

 

 

Latest in Web Tracking: Stealthy ‘Supercookies’

The Wall Street Journal

Aug 18, 2011

By JULIA ANGWIN

 

 

Major websites such as MSN.com and Hulu.com have been tracking people’s online activities using powerful new methods that are almost impossible for computer users to detect, new research shows.

 

What ‘History Stealing’ Is

SNEAKY

The new techniques, which are legal, reach beyond the traditional “cookie,” a small file that websites routinely install on users’ computers to help track their activities online. Hulu and MSN were installing files known as “supercookies,” which are capable of re-creating users’ profiles after people deleted regular cookies, according to researchers at Stanford University and University of California at Berkeley.

Websites and advertisers have faced strong criticism for collecting and selling personal data about computer users without their knowledge, and a half-dozen privacy bills have been introduced on Capitol Hill this year.

Many of the companies found to be using the new techniques say the tracking was inadvertent and they stopped it after being contacted by the researchers.

Mike Hintze, associate general counsel at MSN parent company Microsoft Corp., said that when the supercookie “was brought to our attention, we were alarmed. It was inconsistent with our intent and our policy.” He said the company removed the computer code, which had been created by Microsoft.

 

WSJ’s Jennifer Valentino-DeVries reports so-called ‘supercookies’ reside in web sites that are tracking web users’ activities and can continue to track users after they click a box to remove cookies from their computer. Photo: Wall Street Journal

Hulu posted a statement online saying it “acted immediately to investigate and address” the issues identified by researchers. It declined to comment further.

The spread of advanced tracking techniques shows how quickly data-tracking companies are adapting their techniques. When The Wall Street Journal examined tracking tools on major websites last year, most of these more aggressive techniques were not in wide use.

But as consumers become savvier about protecting their privacy online, the new techniques appear to be gaining ground.

 

sneaky01
Linda A. Cicero/Stanford News Service
Stanford researcher and doctoral candidate Jonathan Mayer

Stanford researcher Jonathan Mayer, a Stanford Ph.D. candidate, identified what is known as a “history stealing” tracking service on Flixster.com, a social-networking service for movie fans recently acquired by Time Warner Inc., and on Charter Communications Inc.’s Charter.net.

Such tracking peers into people’s Web-browsing histories to see if they previously had visited any of more than 1,500 websites, including ones dealing with fertility problems, menopause and credit repair, the researchers said. History stealing has been identified on other sites in recent years, but rarely at that scale.

Mr. Mayer determined that the history stealing on those two sites was being done by Epic Media Group, a New York digital-marketing company. Charter and Flixster said they didn’t have a direct relationship with Epic, but as is common in online advertising, Epic’s tracking service was installed by advertisers.

Don Mathis, chief executive of Epic, says his company was inadvertently using the technology and no longer uses it. He said the information was used only to verify the accuracy of data that it had bought from other vendors.

Both Flixster and Charter say they were unaware of Epic’s activities and have since removed all Epic technology from their sites. Charter did the same last year with a different vendor doing history stealing on a smaller scale.

Gathering information about Web-browsing history can offer valuable clues about people’s interests, concerns or household finances. Someone researching a disease online, for example, might be thought to have the illness, or at least to be worried about it.

 

The potential for privacy legislation in Washington has driven the online-ad industry to establish its own rules, which it says are designed to alert computer users of tracking and offer them ways to limit the use of such data by advertisers.

Under the self-imposed guidelines, collecting health and financial data about individuals is permissible as long as the data don’t contain financial-account numbers, Social Security numbers, pharmaceutical prescriptions or medical records. But using techniques such as history stealing and supercookies “to negate consumer choices” about privacy violates the guidelines, says Lee Peeler, executive vice president of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, one of several groups enforcing the rules.

Until now, the council “has been trying to push companies into the program, not kick them out,” Mr. Peeler says. “You can expect to see more formal public enforcement soon.”

Last year, the online-ad industry launched a program to label ads that are sent to computer users based on tracking data. The goal is to provide users a place to click in the ad itself that would let them opt out of receiving such targeted ads. (It doesn’t turn off tracking altogether.) The program has been slow to catch on, new findings indicate.

The industry has estimated that nearly 80% of online display ads are based on tracking data. Mr. Mayer, along with researchers Jovanni Hernandez and Akshay Jagadeesh of Stanford’s Computer Science Security Lab, found that only 9% of the ads they examined on the 500 most popular websites—62 out of 627 ads—contained the label. They looked at standard-size display ads placed by third parties between Aug. 4 and 11.

The industry says self-regulation is working. Peter Kosmala, managing director of the Digital Advertising Alliance, says the labeling program has made “tremendous progress.”

Mr. Mayer discovered that several Microsoft-owned websites, including MSN.com and Microsoft.com, were using supercookies.

Supercookies are stored in different places than regular cookies, such as within the Web browser’s “cache” of previously visited websites, which is where the Microsoft ones were located. Privacy-conscious users who know how to find and delete regular cookies might have trouble locating supercookies.

Mr. Mayer also found supercookies on Microsoft’s advertising network, which places ads for other companies across the Internet. As a result, people could have had the supercookie installed on their machines without visiting Microsoft websites directly. Even if they deleted regular cookies, information about their Web-browsing could have been retained by Microsoft.

Microsoft’s Mr. Hintze said that the company removed the code after being contacted by Mr. Mayer, and that Microsoft is still trying to figure out why the code was created. A spokeswoman said the data gathered by the supercookie were used only by Microsoft and weren’t shared with outside companies.

Separately last month, researchers at the University of California at Berkeley, led by law professor Chris Hoofnagle, found supercookie techniques used by dozens of sites. One of them, Hulu, was storing tracking coding in files related to Adobe Systems Inc.’s widely used Flash software, which enables many of the videos found online, the researchers said in a report. Hulu is owned by NBC Universal, Walt Disney Co. and News Corp., owner of The Wall Street Journal.

Hulu was one of several companies that entered into a $2.4 million class-action settlement last year related to the use of Flash cookies to circumvent users who tried to delete their regular cookies.

The Berkeley researchers also found that Hulu’s website contained code from Kissmetrics, a company that analyzes website-traffic data. Kissmetrics was inserting supercookies into users’ browser caches and into files associated with the latest version of the standard programming language used to build Web pages, known as HTML5.

In a blog post after the report was released, Kissmetrics said it would use only regular cookies for future tracking. The company didn’t return calls seeking comment.

 

Direct Link:  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903480904576508382675931492.html

 

Hacking Group ‘Anonymous’ Takes First Step in ‘Master Plan,’ Vows to Strike Again

ABC News

By OLIVIA KATRANDJIAN
Dec. 26, 2011

 

 

PHOTO: Activists of the organization "Anonymous" hold masks in front of their faces during a demonstration in Berlin.
Occupy Wall Street: ‘Anonymous’ Hacker Threat

The global activist hacking group Anonymous claims to have obtained thousands of credit card numbers and personal information from the high-profile clients of a leading analytical intelligence company, all in the name of charity.

Up to $1 million was reportedly stolen from Stratfor, in Austin, Texas, a leading provider of military, economic and political analysis for clients that include Apple and the U.S. Air Force.

“#AntiSec plundered 200gb of their mails and more booty,” read a tweet by @AnonymousIRC on Saturday.

Anonymous, an online community with no hierarchical organization, had been working with the hacking group Lulzsec on a series of hacking attacks it called Operation Anti-Security, or Operation AntiSec. The operation began in June 2011, with an attack on the Serious Organized Crime Agency, the U.K.’s national law enforcement agency. Since then, attacks have targeted the governments of Brazil, Tunisia and Zimbabwe, NATO, various U.S. law enforcement websites and Fox News.

Anonymous promised that the attack on Stratfor was just the beginning of an assault on a long list of targets.

“#Antisec has enough targets lined up to extend the fun fun fun of #LulzXmas throught the entire next week,” @AnonymousIRC tweeted.

 

In a statement released today, Anonymous said, “Tomorrow, we will be dropping another enormous dump on our next target: the entire customer database from an online military and law enforcement supply store.”

 

 

PHOTO: Activists of the organization "Anonymous" hold masks in front of their faces during a demonstration in Berlin.
Michael Gottschalk/AFP/Getty Images
Activists of the organization “Anonymous”…

Occupy Wall Street: ‘Anonymous’ Hacker Threat Watch Video
‘Anonymous’ Hackers Get Vocal on Web Watch Video
Celeb Hacker Apologizes Watch Video

The group said Stratfor was “clueless … when it comes to database security,” noting that many passwords were merely the company’s name.

Stratfor’s website is currently shut down, with the message, “Site is currently undergoing maintenance.”

The company is participating in an ongoing investigation with law enforcement, including the FBI, Kyle Rhodes, the public relations manager, told ABC News.

Stratfor warned its clients against publically supporting the company: “It’s come to our attention that our members who are speaking out in support of us on Facebook may be targeted for doing so and are at risk of having sensitive information repeatedly published on other websites.”

Victim Says “You’re Not Helping Anybody, You’re Hurting Everybody”

Allen Barr fell victim to the attack. Now retired, Barr lives on a fixed income and said $700 was stolen from his debit card.

“They’re trying to hurt banks and big corporations, they’re really hurting just people,” said Barr.

Anonymous claims it isn’t hurting people but rather donating the stolen money to various charities, like a modern day Robin Hood. Receipts the group posted show donations to the Red Cross and Save the Children Foundation.

“Just because you think you’re taking something from the rich and giving to the poor, no you’re not. You’re not helping anybody, you’re hurting everybody,” said Barr.

“They have, in the past, hacked into systems, taken money, donated to charities and nonprofits — that has occurred, but other people are just stealing out of greed,” said ABC News consultant and former FBI agent Brad Garrett.

Anonymous has made headlines the world over for a string of high-profile hacks the group claims to have carried out — from allegedly hitting the websites for Paypal, Visa and Mastercard to name a few.

“They can clean out your banking account or use your credit card number and charge a number of items before its ever figured out,” said Garrett.

 

Direct Link:   http://abcnews.go.com/US/hacking-group-anonymous-vows-hit/story?id=15234349#.TvkShVYlpI5

 

Victims in hacking of security analyst Stratfor targeted after speaking to news media, online

By Associated Press

Monday, December 26, 2:40 PM

 

NEW YORK — Victims of a data breach at the security analysis firm Stratfor apparently are being targeted a second time after speaking out about the hacking.

Stratfor said on its Facebook page that some individuals who offered public support for the company after it revealed it was hacked “may be being targeted for doing so.”

The loose-knit hacking movement “Anonymous” claimed Sunday through Twitter that it had stolen thousands of credit card numbers and other personal information belonging to the company’s clients. Anonymous members posted links to some of the information Sunday and more on Monday.

Stratfor, based in Austin, Texas, said its affected clients and its supporters “are at risk of having sensitive information repeatedly published on other websites.” The company has resorted to communicating through Facebook while its website remains down and its email suspended.

A message posted online Monday by a group asserting it spoke for Anonymous mocked victims who spoke to The Associated Press about the experience of learning that their credit card information was stolen and used to make unauthorized charitable donations. The message also ridiculed someone who criticized the hacking on Facebook, saying “we went ahead and ran up your card a bit.”

A Stratfor spokesman would not say whether the information was encrypted in its database or what the company has learned since the incident began.

Anonymous has said the data was not encrypted. If true, that would be a major embarrassment for a security-related company.

The spokesman, Kyle Rhodes, said the company could not discuss any details because several law enforcement agencies are investigating the incident.

The data was posted in a series of releases in links embedded in online messages that, in turn, were linked to from Twitter.

Some of the files appear to be alphabetical listings of Stratfor clients with related credit card information. The amount posted suggests that information about more than 100,000 individuals and thousands of companies was exposed. The posts also contain files of emails within Stratfor’s information technology department, and what appears to be a list of passwords for Stratfor IT staff.

The posted data identifies thousands of major financial, defense and technology firms, media companies, government agencies and multiple units of the United Nations as Stratfor clients. The hackers said this was evidence that they had breached Straftor’s “private clients,” a claim the company denied.

“Contrary to this assertion, the disclosure was merely a list of some of the members that have purchased our publications and does not comprise a list of individuals or entities that have a relationship with Stratfor beyond their purchase of our subscription-based publications,” Stratfor said in an email and on Facebook.

The hackers initially claimed their goal was to use stolen the credit information to donate to charities at Christmas, and some victims confirmed unauthorized transactions were made from their credit accounts in recent days. The messages also said the hackers are targeting companies “that play fast and loose with their customers’ private and sensitive information.”

Stratfor provides political, economic and military analysis to help clients reduce cyber security risks, according to a description on its YouTube page. It charges subscribers for its reports and analysis, delivered through the web, emails and videos.

The company’s home page carried a banner Monday that said its “website is currently undergoing maintenance.”

Anonymous warned it plans more attacks this week. The movement has previously claimed responsibility for attacks on credit card processors Visa Inc. and MasterCard Inc., eBay Inc.’s PayPal, as well as banks, groups in the music industry and the Church of Scientology.

The Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, a watchdog that tracks data breaches, made the Stratfor hacking its 121st such incident of the year targeting credit cards.

Anonymous, reported to be a loose-knit group of hackers, became famous for attacking the companies and institutions that oppose anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange. The message Monday said the attacks could be averted. “Have you given our comrade Bradley Manning his holiday feast yet, at a fancy restaurant of his choosing?” Manning is the Army private facing court martial for allegedly sending hundreds of thousands of diplomatic documents and Iraq and Afghanistan war zone field reports to WikiLeaks. A seven-day hearing into the biggest national security leak in U.S. history ended Thursday.

 

Direct Link:  http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/victims-in-hacking-of-think-tank-stratfor-are-targeted-after-speaking-to-news-media-and-online/2011/12/26/gIQAXfT7IP_story.html

 

© 2012 G.E. Investigations Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha